A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicismSpingarn, Joel Elias
Philosophy
A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicism
Spingarn, Joel Elias
Criticism; Renaissance
The series of rhetorical and metrical treatises that precede Du Bellay's
_Defense_ begins with _L'Art de dictier et de fere chancons, balades,
virelais et rondeaulx_, written by the poet Eustache Deschamps in 1392,
over half a century after the similar work of Antonio da Tempo in
Italy.[311] Toward the close of the fifteenth century a work of the same
nature, the _Fleur de Rhetorique_, by an author who refers to himself as
L'Infortune, seems to have had some influence on later treatises. Three
works of this sort fall within the first half of the sixteenth century:
the _Grand et vrai Art de pleine Rhetorique_ of Pierre Fabri, published
at Rouen in 1521; the _Rhetorique metrifiee_ of Gracien du Pont,
published at Paris in 1539; and the _Art Poetique_ of Thomas Sibilet,
published at Paris in 1548. The second part of Fabri's _Rhetorique_
deals with questions of versification--of rhyme, rhythm, and the complex
metrical form of such poets as Cretin, Meschinot, and Molinet, in whom
Pasquier found _prou de rime et equivoque, mais peu de raison_. As the
_Rhetorique_ of Fabri is little more than an amplification of the
similar work of L'Infortune, so the work of Gracien du Pont is little
more than a reproduction of Fabri's. Gracien du Pont is still chiefly
intent on _rime equivoquee_, _rime entrelacee_, _rime retrograde_, _rime
concatenee_, and the various other mediaeval complexities of
versification. Sibilet's _Art Poetique_ is more interesting than any of
its predecessors. It was published a year before the _Defense_ of Du
Bellay, and discusses many of the new _genres_ which the latter
advocates. Sibilet treats of the sonnet, which had recently been
borrowed from the Italians by Mellin de Saint-Gelais, the ode, which had
just been employed by Pelletier, and the epigram, as practised by Marot.
The eclogue is described as "Greek by invention, Latin by usurpation,
and French by imitation." But one of the most interesting passages in
Sibilet's book is that in which the French morality is compared with the
classical drama. This passage exhibits perhaps the earliest trace of the
influence of Italian ideas on French criticism; it will be discussed
later in connection with the dramatic theories of this period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account