A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicismSpingarn, Joel Elias
Philosophy
A History of Literary Criticism in the Renaissance: With special reference to the influence of Italy in the formation and development of modern classicism
Spingarn, Joel Elias
Criticism; Renaissance
[340] _Essais_, i. 36, Florio's translation.
[341] Ronsard, vii. 322. _Cf._ Aristotle, _Poet._ ix. 1-4; xxv. 6, 7.
[342] _Poet._ iii. 24.
[343] _De Poeta_, pp. 44, 47.
[344] _Art Poet._ i. 187.
[345] _Ibid._ i. 87 _sq._
[346] _Art Poet._ ii. 261.
[347] _Ibid._ i. 697 _sq._
[348] _Osservationi_, Vinegia, 1560, p. 190.
[349] _Art Poet._ i. 744.
[350] _Art Poet._ i. 19. _Cf._ Tasso, cited by Shelley, _Defence_, p.
42, "No one merits the name of creator except God and the poet."
[351] Sylvester's _Du Bartas_, 1641, p. 242.
[352] _Art Poet._ i. 149.
[353] Sibilet, _Art Poet._ ii. 8.
[354] Pelletier, _Art Poet._ ii. 7.
[355] _Ibid._
[356] Robert, app. iii.
[357] Ronsard, iii. 18 _sq._
[358] _Art Poet._ iii. 153.
[359] _Ibid._ ii. 1113, 441.
[360] _Art Poet._ ii. 459.
[361] _Ibid._ iii. 143.
[362] _Ibid._ iii. 181.
[363] _Ibid._ iii. 189 _sq._
[364] Robert, app. iv.
[365] _Art Poet._ v. 6.
[366] Robert, app. iii.
[367] _Poetica_, p. 534.
[368] Ronsard, iii. 19.
[369] _Arte Poetica_, p. 71.
[370] _Ibid._ p. 12; _De Poeta_, p. 149.
[371] _Art Poet._ ii. 253.
[372] Boileau, _Art Poet._ iii. 45.
[373] Arnaud, app. iii.
[374] _Art Poet._ iii. 45.
[375] _Art Poet._ ii. 8.
[376] _Ibid._ i. 3.
[377] _Ibid._ i. 5. _Cf._ Capriano, cap. v.
[378] Ronsard, iii. 23, 29.
[379] Vauquelin, _Art Poet._ i. 471, 503.
[380] Boileau, _Art Poet._ iii. 161.
CHAPTER III
CLASSIC AND ROMANTIC ELEMENTS IN FRENCH CRITICISM DURING THE SIXTEENTH
CENTURY
THE principle for which the Pleiade stood was, like that of humanism,
the imitation of the classics; and the Pleiade was the first to
introduce this as a literary principle into France. This means, as
regards French literature, in the first place, the substitution of the
classical instead of its own national tradition; and, secondly, the
substitution of the imitation of the classics for the imitation of
nature itself. In making these vital substitutions, Du Bellay and his
school have been accused of creating once and for all the gulf that
separates French poetry from the national life.[381] This accusation is
perhaps unfair to the Pleiade, which insisted on the poet's going
directly to nature, which emphasized most strongly the sentiment for
natural scenery and beauty, and which first declared the importance of
the artisan and the peasant as subjects for poetry. But there can be but
little doubt that the separation of poetry from the national life was
the logical outcome of the doctrines of the Pleiade. In disregarding the
older French poets and the evolution of indigenous poetry, in
formulating an ideal of the poet as an unsociable and ascetic
character, it separated itself from the natural tendencies of French
life and letters, and helped to effect the final separation between
poetry and the national development.
I. _Classical Elements_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account