A History of Magic and Experimental Science, Volume 2 (of 2): During the First Thirteen Centuries of Our EraThorndike, Lynn
History
A History of Magic and Experimental Science, Volume 2 (of 2): During the First Thirteen Centuries of Our Era
Thorndike, Lynn
Magic -- History; Science -- History
Was Hildegard influenced by Bernard
Silvester?--(Bibliographical note)--Her personality
and reputation--Dates of her works--Question of
their genuineness--Question of her knowledge of
Latin--Subject-matter of her works--Relations
between science and religion in them--Her peculiar
views concerning winds and rivers--Her suggestions
concerning drinking-water--The devil as the negative
principle--Natural substances and evil spirits--Stars and
fallen angels; sin and nature--Nature in Adam’s time;
the antediluvian period--Spiritual lessons from natural
phenomena--Hildegard’s attitude toward magic--Magic Art’s
defense--True Worship’s reply--Magic properties of natural
substances--Instances of counter-magic--Ceremony with a
jacinth and wheaten loaf--Her superstitious procedure--Use
of herbs--Marvelous virtues of gems--Remarkable
properties of fish--Use of the parts of birds--Cures from
quadrupeds--The unicorn, weasel, and mouse--What animals to
eat and wear--Insects and reptiles--Animal compounds--Magic
and astrology closely connected--Astrology and divination
condemned--Signs in the stars--Superiors and inferiors;
effect of stars and winds on elements and humors--Influence
of the moon on human health and generation--Relation of the
four humors to human character and fate--Hildegard’s varying
position--Nativities for the days of the moon--Man the
microcosm--Divination in dreams.
[Sidenote: Was Hildegard influenced by Bernard Silvester?]
The discussion of macrocosm and microcosm, _nous_ and _hyle_, by
Bernard Silvester in the _De mundi universitate_ is believed by Dr.
Charles Singer, in a recent essay on “The Scientific Views and Visions
of Saint Hildegard,” to have influenced her later writings, such as
the _Liber vitae meritorum_ and the _Liber divinorum operum_. He
writes “The work of Bernard ... corresponds so closely both in form,
in spirit, and sometimes even in phraseology to the _Liber divinorum
operum_ that it appears to us certain that Hildegard must have had
access to it.”[338] Without subscribing unreservedly to this view,
we pass on from the Platonist and geomancer of Tours to the Christian
“sibyl of the Rhine.”[339]
[Sidenote: Her personality and reputation.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account