A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[298] "The family is therefore distinguished from the family
group and the clan as a group of kinsfolk established by
contract, and only in a subsidiary sense by the tie of blood
between parents and children."--_Op. cit._, 13. With Starcke's
view compare that of Posada, who uses the suggestive word
_symbiose_ (_convivencia_) to express the totality of influences
concerned in the origin of society. He says: "En somme, d'après
tout ce qui vient d'être dit, la société humaine ne peut pas
être considérée comme ayant eu la familie pour origine. A la
force _instinctive_ du sang, au fait nécessaire et primitif de
l'union sexuelle, il faut ajouter et combiner la _symbiose_, qui
tend à devenir territoriale, et résulte du besoin fondamental de
la conservation: elle implique la coopération universelle et la
vie de relation, déterminée par le plaisir, par la sympathie,
par la nécessité de faire face aux exigences d'autres hommes;
elle implique aussi la coopération universelle, non plus de mari
à femme, ni de père à fils, mais d'homme à homme."--_Théories
modernes_, 99, 100, 96, 81 ff., _passim_.
[299] WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 20-22.
[300] _Ibid._, 22 ff., 379, 535. On these customs, often taken
as evidences of former promiscuity, compare LIPPERT,
_Geschichte der Familie_, 6, 7; and the examples in _ZVR._, V,
353; XI, 135, 136.
As a result of the first argument, then, marriage appears as a
fundamental institution, whose beginnings are anterior to the
dawn of human history. But there is need of a new definition,
one broad enough to satisfy the demands of science. For most
existing definitions are of a "merely juridical or ethical nature,
comprehending either what is required to make the union legal, or
what, in the eye of an idealist, the union ought to be." Hence
Westermarck defines marriage, from a scientific point of view,
as a "more or less durable connection between male and female,
lasting beyond the mere act of propagation till after the birth of
offspring;" and Starcke, in like spirit, declares that marriage in
the widest sense is "only a connection between man and woman which
is of more than momentary duration, and as long as it endures they
seek for subsistence in common."[301]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account