A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
a curious device for the preservation of domestic peace.[329] All
these tribes "guard with great caution against, and some even punish
with death, the union of the two sexes before the complete puberty
of the woman.... Friar Francisco assured me that the virginity of
the man was strictly maintained until the epoch of his marriage,
and this was not allowed before he was twenty-five years of age,
without even this being the ordinary thing: marriage is commonly
after thirty." As a principal reason for this usage are assigned the
"force and energy of the offspring."[330]
[324] For general criticism of the hypothesis of promiscuity
compare with WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, chaps. iv-vi,
51-133; WAKE, _op. cit._, 14-53; LETOURNEAU,
_op. cit._, 46 ff.; STARCKE, _op. cit._, 121 ff., 241
ff., _passim_; SPENCER, _Principles of Sociology_, I,
661-71, 641 ff., _passim_; GROSSE, _Die Formen der
Familie_, 41 ff.
[325] WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 52, 53; BELCHER,
"Notes on the Andaman Islands," _Trans. Eth. Soc._, N. S., V, 45.
[326] _Journal Anth. Inst._, XII, 135; WESTERMARCK, _op.
cit._, 57.
[327] MAGALHÃES, _op. cit._, 108 ff.
[328] Compare the somewhat analogous "communism" of the Sia:
STEVENSON, "The Sia," _XI. Rep. of Bureau of Eth._,
19-26.
[329] There are in the villages "men destined to be _viri
viduarum_. These individuals have no other duty; they are
supported by the tribe and do not, like the others, engage in the
exercises of long trips which they all make annually, each in
his turn." This indulgence was justified on the ground that "the
peace which the families enjoyed, and which they would not enjoy
without these individuals, or rather without this institution,
compensated largely for the work that fell upon the others in
supporting them."--MAGALHÃES, _loc. cit._
[330] MAGALHÃES, _loc. cit._
Savage tribes are often extremely licentious; but it is significant
that the most immoral are not always lowest in the scale of
development. Besides, it is well known that "contact with a
higher culture, or more properly, the dregs of it, is pernicious
to the morality of peoples living in a more or less primitive
condition."[331] Nor can promiscuity as a general social stage be
assumed from the existence of some tribes whose sexual relations are
but slightly restrained, since, as just seen, there are others, not
otherwise more advanced, remarkable for the chastity of the wedded
as well as the unwedded life.[332]
[331] WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 66 ff., where examples
are given. See the quotation from Magalhães above.
[332] _Ibid._, 61 ff.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account