A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
First, it may result from a struggle for women within the tribe.
"There still exist rude tribes in which men fight for possession
of women, the taking possession of a woman naturally comes as a
sequence to an act of capture. That monopoly which constitutes her
a wife in the only sense known by the primitive man is a result of
successful violence."[357] Secondly, contrary to the view of Sir
John Lubbock,[358] the symbol of rape may be due to the struggle
of the bride and her female friends, many manifestations of which
are found in the marriage customs of primitive races; though the
dread of harsh treatment is thought to be an additional motive. But
Starcke, doubting whether among savages there is much to choose
between the brutality of the husband and that of the father, thinks
the weeping of the woman merely symbolizes her sorrow "on leaving
her former home; her close dependence on her family is expressed by
her lamentation." The existence of such symbols is not surprising in
"communities of which the family bond is the alpha and omega."[359]
The ceremony of capture, finally, may be due to the resistance of
the father and other male friends of the bride. A woman has an
economic value, "not only as a wife but also as a daughter; and all
through, from the lowest to the highest stages of social progress,
we find a tacit or avowed claim to her service by her father."
Her service is an object of purchase; and in English law "we have
evidence that it was originally so among ourselves: in an action for
seduction the deprivation of a daughter's services is the injury
alleged."[360]
[356] SPENCER, _Principles of Sociology_, I, 649-52.
It should be noted that McLennan really ascribes the origin of
exogamy to wife-capture, though, inadvertently seemingly, in one
passage he refers it to a "primitive instinct."
[357] See STARCKE, _op. cit._, 217, who thinks Spencer
inconsistent with his own theory; for "if the rape of women can
be practised within the tribe, it need no longer be assumed that
a young man's ambition impels him to take a wife from another
tribe."
[358] _Origin of Civilization_, 111, 130.
[359] STARCKE, _op. cit._, 217, 218.
[360] SPENCER, _op. cit._, I, 652-60. Spencer is
criticised by WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 311 ff.;
STARCKE, _op. cit._, 215 ff.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account