A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
it is rightly explained as a stage in the decay of purchase and
in the rise of the dower; but when we find the return of gifts in
use among such rude peoples, for instance, as the Bechuanas, the
Kalmucks, the Makassars, and the American Indians,[713] it seems
reasonable to suppose that the custom, in some cases at least, may
represent a ceremonial development of free marriage, taking its rise
in various motives. Thus among the Todas, it has been suggested,
the transaction appears as an exchange of dowers to serve as a
security for the mutual good behavior of the future couple.[714]
Similarly with the American Indians the gift to the bride's parents
may sometimes be designed to purchase clan privileges[715] or to
procure the "alliance of the wife's cabin;" while the exchange of
presents, which is found where it is usual for the husband to take
up his abode in the wife's home, ought perhaps to be regarded as a
matrimonial compact of alliance between the two families.[716]
[709] WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 397.
[710] Compare SARASIN, _Die Weddas von Ceylon_, I, 460,
461. Sometimes girdles (_Lendenschnuren_) are exchanged by bride
and groom. Free courtship exists; and this primitive people
presents a notable example of the pairing-family. The English
author DEBUTTS naïvely remarks, "The savage Veddahs live
in pairs like the beasts of the forest": SARASIN, _op.
cit._, I, 549.
[711] Such is the case among the Ainos of Yesso and the Brazilian
Puris, Coroados, and Coropos: WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._,
397, 398. Among the Polynesians the present seems to be designed
to gain the good-will of the wife's parents, but when the wife's
family is the inferior in rank, the husband, though rendering
the wooing-gift, receives a dower with his bride: WAKE,
_op. cit._, 390. On the "wooing-gift" see POST,
_Familienrecht_, 173, 175; _idem_, _Afrikanische Jurisprudenz_,
I, 342 ff.; KOHLER, in _ZVR._, V, 356; KOEHNE,
_ibid._, IX, 461 (Kalmucks); HILDEBRAND, _Ueber das
Problem_, 17 ff., who, as already noted, regards gift as
preceding purchase; and CRAWLEY, _Mystic Rose_, 386
ff., who holds that "the so-called bride-price was originally of
the same class as the _kalduke_, a pledge, a part of one's self,
given to another and received from him."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account