the third declaration, unlike the other two, is irrevocable, definitively dissolving the marriage bond.[759] [756] The wife is entitled to a divorce in this way when the husband (1) leaves her without support; (2) accuses her falsely of unfaithfulness; (3) refuses to acknowledge the child which she has borne him; (4) when he abandons the faith; or (5) fails in "marital duty": HELLWALD, _Die mensch. Familie_, 409. But in practice little use is made of this form, the woman preferring instead to declare before the judge that she is in a condition of matrimonial "insurrection," by which means the husband is usually led to "repudiate" her: _idem_, _loc. cit._ [757] The procedure by oath is allowed when the husband is persuaded, but cannot prove, that the wife is pregnant by another man; and the action must precede the _accouchement_. The wife may take a similar oath that the husband's belief is unfounded: HELLWALD, _op. cit._, 409. [758] But other phrases, such as "Cover thee with thy veil," or "Seek another man," may be employed: HELLWALD, _op. cit._, 409. Compare the three formulæ used in Algiers: LETOURNEAU, _op. cit._, 297. [759] HELLWALD, _op. cit._, 410, 411; following especially VINCENTI, _Die Ehe im Islâm_, 22, 23. After the third divorce or declaration there is still a way in which the man can get his wife back when she, in due legal form, has married another man, and has been repudiated by him. This procedure is usually collusive by means of a "straw husband": HELLWALD, _loc. cit._, citing EFENDI, _Türkische Skizzen_, II, 15. In general see UNGER, _Die Ehe_, 48-50; LETOURNEAU, _op. cit._, 289-99, on the triple declaration among Mohammedan peoples of Africa.