A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 1 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[765] MÖLLENDORFF, _Das chin. Familienrecht_, 32. In
China a man is legally incapable of adultery. If the husband
slay either the man or the woman taken _in flagrante delicto_,
he must do so on the instant; "though it is also allowable for
the husband to kill the adulterer outside the house, if it be
in chase. But if the husband first ties up the adulterer, and
then kills him, he will be guilty of a transportable offence....
If the husband kills the wife afterwards, he will be liable to
three years' transportation and 100 blows."--ALABASTER,
_Chinese Criminal Law_, 187, 188. If the paramour kills the
husband, the wife is strangled, whether she knew of the
crime or not, provided the husband has not consented to the
adultery. Grace is shown the woman only "when the murder
was sudden and unpremeditated;" but then only in case that
she "fly to the rescue, and give the alarm, and do her best
to bring the murderer to justice by denouncing him to the
authorities."--ALABASTER, _op. cit._, 194. The price
of the guilty wife sold as a concubine falls to the state:
MÖLLENDORFF, 32.
[766] The agreement, however, must be in good faith. Should
the wife plan the divorce so as to form a punishable relation
with another man, it is void, and the husband may retain the
woman or sell her to another as in the case of unfaithfulness:
KOHLER, "Aus dem chin. Civilrecht," _ZVR._, VI, 376.
[767] MÖLLENDORFF, _op. cit._, 32; HELLWALD,
_op. cit._, 380, 381; ALABASTER, _op. cit._, 182
ff.; GROSSE, _Die Formen der Familie_, 225 ff.;
KATSCHER, _Bilder aus dem chin. Leben_, 90 ff., _passim_.
[768] If he puts away his wife without just cause, he is
to receive eighty blows with the bamboo and take her back:
WAKE, _Marriage and Kinship_, 232; KOHLER,
_loc. cit._, 375; WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 523;
LETOURNEAU, _op. cit._, 300, 301; DOOLITTLE,
_Social Life of the Chinese_, I, 106, 107.
According to TSCHENG-KI-TONG, _China und die Chinesen_,
55, barrenness is the only serious ground of divorce in
China, and even of this little use is made, particularly by
the aristocracy; but this view is not sustained by other
evidence, divorce being frequent among the lower classes:
HELLWALD, _op. cit._, 380, 381.
[769] KOHLER, _loc. cit._ On the other hand, the
interpretation of these rules may often be "too elastic" in
favor of the man. In one of the old Chinese books, according to
WESTERMARCK, _op. cit._, 524, 525, "when a woman has any
quality that is not good, it is but just and reasonable to turn
her out of doors.... Among the ancients a wife was turned away if
she allowed the house to be full of smoke, or if she frightened
the dog with her disagreeable noise": citing NAVARETTE,
_An Account of the Empire of China_ (London, 1704), 73.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account