On the general controversy see especially _Colloquii über die Frage: Ob Gott verboten oder zugelassen habe dass einer seines verstorbenen Weibes Schwester heyraten möge_ (Oettingen [1681]), 12 ff.; and KETTNER (L.F.E.), _Judicia und Responsa von der Ehe mit des Weibes Schwester_ (Quedlinburg [_ca._ 1710]), 1 ff., neither of which appears in HUTH'S list; also ZEIDLER, _De mat. cum defunctae uxoris sorore_, published with his _De polygamia_ (Helmstadt, 1698); and MICHAELIS _Abhandlung von den Ehegesetzen Mosis_ (Göttingen, 1768). Among the vast number of tracts and books on the subject for England a few of the more important are KEBLE, _Against Profane Dealing with Holy Matrimony_ (Oxford, 1849); FOSTER, _Review of the Law_ (London, 1847); PUSEY, _Letter on the proposed Change in the Laws prohib. Mar. between Near Kin_ (Oxford, 1842); _idem_, _Evidence given before the Commission_ (Oxford, 1849); _idem_, _God's Prohibition_ (Oxford and London, 1860); BINNEY, _The Men of Glasgow and the Women of Scotland_ (London, [1850]); GIBSON, _Mar. Aff. Question_ (Edinburgh, 1854); DUKE, _The Question of Incest_ (2d ed., London, 1883). This question, with others, is also dealt with by FRY, _The Case of Mar. between Near Kindred_ (London, 1756, 1773); ALLEYNE, _The Legal Degrees of Mar._ (London, 1774, 1775); MACRAE, _Script. Law of Mar._ (2d ed., Edinburgh, 1862); MEYER, _Uxor christiana_ (Amsterdam, 1688), 2d dissertation; and KETTNER (J. J.), _Zwei Abhandlungen_ (Leipzig, 1780), 67 ff. For discussion of related questions of kinship compare BUTLER, _Marriage of Cousin Germans_ (Oxford, 1619); the same in Latin under the leading title _Suggeneia_ in FLORENS, _De nuptiis consobrinarum_ (Frankfort, 1643); DUGARD, _Marriage of Cousin Germans_ (Oxford, 1673); JOHNSTOUN, _Juridical Dissertation_ (London, 1734); PATON, _Mar. with a Dec. Brother's Wife_ (London, 1869), and in general read _Observations on the Mar. Laws_, 126 ff.; LAWRENCE, in _Revue de droit int._, II, 65 ff.; JEAFFRESON, _Brides and Bridals_, II, 258 ff.; HAMMICK, _Marriage Law_, 23, 30-40; GEARY, _Mar. and Fam. Rel._, II, 30-32; WHARTON, _Exposition of the Laws_, 200, note; BISHOP, _Mar., Div. and Sep._, I, §§736 ff., 747, 750, 752, 753, 875 ff.; _Law Mag._, XXI, 371-82 (May, 1839); _Quarterly Review_, LXXXV, 156-82 (July, 1849); _Ecc. Review_, new series, II, 735-48.] [Footnote 294: LECKY, _Democracy and Liberty_, II, 214, who cites "the very candid confession of the Bishop of Winchester": HANSARD'S _Debates_, 3d series, CCLXXX, 1671.] [Footnote 295: LECKY, _op. cit._, II, 215, citing T. PAYNTER ALLEN'S pamphlet already mentioned. There is a weak criticism of this work in the _Tracts Issued by the Mar. Law Defence Union_, I, 177-96. On its high authority see HUTH, _Mar. of Near Kin_, 129.