A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[Footnote 537: These convictions are usually not for "adultery,"
but for being in bed together, according to a clause of the
act of 1694 providing that when a man is found in bed with
another person's wife each offender shall receive not more than
thirty stripes, unless one was surprised and not consenting.
For examples, some of them acquittals and some convictions, see
_MSS. Records of the Superior Court of Judicature_, I (Oct.
30, 1694), fol. 129; _ibid._, III (May 7, 1700), foll. 10, 11;
_ibid._, 1736-38 (Aug. 8, 1738), fol. 209; _ibid._, 1757-59 (Aug.
1, 1758), 391; _ibid._, 1757-59 (Feb. 21, 1759), 554; _ibid._,
1760-62 (Sept. 16, 1760), foll. 122, 123; _ibid._, 1763-64 (Jan.
25, 1763), fol. 11; _ibid._, 1763-64 (April 26, 1763), fol. 44;
_ibid._, 1767-68 (April 12, 1765), fol. 164; _MSS. Records of
Gen. Sessions of Suffolk_ (April 2, 1717), II, 151.
For the earlier period the Athenæum copy of the _MSS. Records of
the County Court of Suffolk_, 34 (March 17, 1671-72), 113 (Jan.
28, 1672-73), 585 (May 5, 1679), 633 (Jan. 27, 1679-80), contains
four analogous cases; and there is one in _MSS. Records of the
County Court of Middlesex_ (April 1, 1684), IV, 97.]
[Footnote 538: Thus at a superior court held at Falmouth for
Cumberland and Lincoln counties, June 28, 1763, the "jurors
present John Lawrence, husbandman, and Mary Lawton, _both
married_, for adulterously dwelling together for five years,
frequently lodging together in the same bed knowing each other
to be married, being found adulterously in bed together and not
surprised but consenting, and having carnal knowledge together.
John was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and the jury returned
a verdict of guilty except to the charge of having committed
adultery. 30 stripes and recognition in £100 to keep the peace."
[Mary not tried.]--_MSS. Records of the Superior Court of
Judicature_ (1763-64), fol. 90. So also before a superior court
held at Worcester, April 20, 1773, Joshua Phillips, laborer,
presented by the jury for "committing _adultery_" with Mary,
wife of Edward Rice, was acquitted. Then the jurors present them
both "for being found at divers times in bed together.... They
pleaded not guilty. Convicted. Joshua fined £20 and costs. Mary
20 stripes and costs."--_Ibid._ (1773-74), foll. 36, 38.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account