A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[Footnote 639: _Ibid._, 275.]
Several other attempts prove not more successful in providing the
venerable widower with a suitable place to rest his "weary Head
in Modesty."[640] But at last, humbly confessing himself, "aged,
and feeble, and exhausted," he offers himself as a husband to Mrs.
Mary Gibbs, of Newton, who is all too yielding in her reply.[641]
For with this gentle dame the astute wooer, erstwhile so meek, at
once proceeds to drive the sharpest bargain in the long history of
his courtships. As she had no property to leave him by will, he
insists upon the following harsh conditions: "I Rode to Newtown in
the Coach, and visited Mrs. Gibbs. Spake of the proposals I had
intimated per Mr. H. Gibbs; for her Sons to be bound to save me
harmless as to her Administration; and to pay me £100. provided
their Mother died before me: I to pay her £50. per a[=n]um during
her Life, if I left her a Widow. She said 'twas hard, she knew not
how to have her children bound to pay that Sum; she might dye in a
little time. Mr. Cotton, whom she call'd spake to the same purpose,
spake of a Joynture. I said I was peremptory as to the indemnifying
Bond; Offer'd to take up with that alone, and allow her forty pounds
per a[=n]um."[642]
[Footnote 640: EARLE, _Customs and Fashions of Old New England_.]
[Footnote 641: SEWALL'S _Diary_, _loc. cit._, 299 (Jan. 12,
1722), 300.]
[Footnote 642: _Ibid._, 300, 301.]
These terms, "hard" as they were and again insisted upon with most
unromantic bluntness,[643] were at length accepted by the amiable
Mary; who, surviving her kindly though grasping spouse, was no doubt
by his side, according to his wish, to "carry it tenderly"[644] with
him when he passed to his last reckoning.
[Footnote 643: "Madam, These are kindly to salute you, and to
say, that the Omission of Answering one or two of my Letters, and
of coming to Town, makes it needful to enquire, what the plain
meaning of your letter of Jan^y. 30^{th} may be. 'I do chuse
to comply with your last proposal, of Releasing my children,
and Accepting of the sum you proposed.' The last Proposal was,
For your children, or some in their behalf, to give Bond,
to indemnify me from all debts contracted by you before the
Marriage; and from all matters respecting the Administration.
This I told you, I peremptorially insist on. I was to secure
you Forty pounds per a[=n]um during the term of your natural
Life, in case of your Survival. This proposal must be taken
entirely, every part of it together, and if the words '_Releasing
my Children_' intend a Releasing them from this Bond, my last
Proposal is not accepted by you."--_Ibid._, 303 (Feb. 10, 1722).]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account