[Footnote 117: "Si mulier discesserit a viro suo despiciens eum, nolens revertere et reconciliari vero, post v. annos cum consensu Episcopi aliam accipere licebit uxorem."--_Poenit. Theod._, II, xii, 19: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 200. The _Poenit. Merseburgense_, c. 104: WASSERSCHLEBEN, _op. cit._, 402, seems to allow the man in such case to marry after one year: "Si mulier a viro discesserit et iterum reversa fuerit, suscipiat eam sine dote et ipsa ann. I poeniteat in p. e. a., similiter et ille, si aliam duxerit."--HINSCHIUS, _Das Ehescheidungsrecht_, 80; but GEFFCKEN thinks the second wife must be sent away when the first wife returns, the man doing penance: _Ehescheidung_, 63, 64. _Cf._ similar provisions in _Poenit. Cummeani_, c. 3, § 31, _Poenit. XXXV Cap._, c. 9, § 2: WASSERSCHLEBEN, _op. cit._, 474, 511; and _Poenit. Theod._, I, xiv, 13: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 188.] [Footnote 118: _Poenit. Theod._, II, xii, 8: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 199.] [Footnote 119: In that case, "licet aliam accipere; melius est sic facere quam fornicationes": _Poenit. Theod._, II, xii, 23: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 200, 201; _cf._ THORPE, _op. cit._, II, 19.] [Footnote 120: _Poenit. Theod._, II, xii, 17, 18: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 200.] [Footnote 121: _Poenit. Theod._, II, xii, 32, xiii, 5: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 201, 202; _cf._ ESMEIN, _Le mariage en droit canonique_, II, 64.] [Footnote 122: _Poenit. Theod._, II, xiii, 4: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 202. These provisions (notes 4 and 5) are similar to those of the synods of Verberie and Compiègne relating to _error conditionis_ and loss of freedom. See p. 42, above; and ESMEIN, _op. cit._, I, 325; II, 68.] [Footnote 123: "Legitimum conjugium non licet frangi sine consensu amborum."--_Poenit. Theod._, II, xii, 7: HADDAN AND STUBBS, _op. cit._, III, 199. _Cf. Poenit. Mers._, c. 123, _Poenit. XXXV Cap._, c. 9, § 1: WASSERSCHLEBEN, _Bussordnungen_, 403, 511. Sometimes in such case remarriage is forbidden: _Judicium Clementis_, § 15: WASSERSCHLEBEN, _op. cit._, 435. _Cf._ ESMEIN _op. cit._, II, 61; GEFFCKEN, _op. cit._, 64; GLASSON, _op. cit._, I, 130, who favors the view of the text; but FREISEN, _op. cit._, 779, 780, thinks that § 7 of _Poenit. Theod._ is supplemented by § 12, which forbids separation on account of infirmity or even to enter religion _cum consensu ambrorum_. This view may be favored by _Excerptiones Ecgberti_, c. 120, 121: THORPE, _op. cit._, II, 114, 115.]