A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3Howard, George Elliott
History
A History of Matrimonial Institutions, Vol. 2 of 3
Howard, George Elliott
Families; Marriage -- History
[Footnote 180: As early as 1520 in his _Von dem bab. Gefängniss
der Kirche_ (STRAMPFF, 349, 350, 381, 382) LUTHER admits the
two grounds of divorce, adultery and desertion; the latter when
either spouse abandons the other "über zehen Jahr oder nimmer
wiederkommen." Two years later, in his _Vom ehelichen Leben_,
he appears to regard refusal of conjugal duty as equivalent
to desertion. "We may find an obstinate woman," he says, "who
stiffens her neck, and if her husband should fall ten times into
unchastity, cares nothing about it. Here it is time for a man to
say, 'if you won't, another can be found that will. If the wife
will not, let the maid come.' Yet let it be so that the husband
give her two or three warnings beforehand, and let the matter
come before other people, so that her obstinacy may be known
and rebuked before the congregation. If she will not, let her
be gone, and procure an Esther for yourself and let Vashti be
off, as Ahasuerus did."--As rendered by WOOLSEY, _Divorce_, 130,
131. For the original see STRAMPFF, 350, 351, 394, 395; LUTHER'S
_Kleinere Schriften_, II, 26-31; and SARCERIUS, _Vom heil.
Ehestande_, 137, 138. _Cf._ RICHTER, _Beiträge_, 16; SCHEURL,
_Das gem. deut. Eherecht_, 300 ff. In LUTHER'S _Von Ehesachen_
(1530) the refusal of conjugal duty is not mentioned; but it is
doubtless included under malicious desertion; and besides in
1531 he commends the book of Brenz in which this position is
taken. _Cf._ RICHTER, _op. cit._, 18, 19; STRAMPFF, 394. In the
_Tischreden_ flight on account of theft is regarded as desertion:
RICHTER, _loc. cit._ On the use made of "definition" by the
Protestants see HUBRICH, _Das Recht der Ehescheidung_, 51.]
[Footnote 181: _Quasi malitiosa desertio_ comprehends not
only refusal of conjugal duty, but also applies to the
case of a defendant who abandoned a consort, but who does
not necessarily, as in malicious desertion, remain in a
place unknown or one beyond the reach of judicial process:
STRIPPELMANN, _Ehescheidungsrecht_, 146 ff. _Cf._ DIETRICH,
_Evang. Ehescheidungsrecht_, 25 ff.; HUBRICH, _Das Recht der
Ehescheidung_, 80, 88 ff. See especially LUTHER, _Vom ehel.
Leben_; STRAMPFF, 394, 395, who says the "weltliche Ubirkeit das
Weib zwingen oder umbbringen" soll.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account