A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic InformationGray, W. H. (William Henry)
History
A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic Information
Gray, W. H. (William Henry)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Oregon; Oregon Territory -- History
It may be asked why the writer gives this explanation of trade and
intercourse with the Indians and missionaries before they have reached
the field of their future labors? For the simple reason that the party,
and the writer in particular, commenced their education in the Rocky
Mountains. They learned that in the country to which they were going
there was an overgrown, unscrupulous, and exacting monopoly that would
prevent any interference in their trade, or intercourse with the
Indians. This information was received through the American fur traders,
and from Captain Wyeth, who was leaving the country; and from Mr. John
McLeod, then in charge of our traveling caravan. It is true, we had only
reached Salmon Falls, on Snake River, and we only wished to buy of the
miserable, naked, filthy objects before us, a few fresh salmon, which
they were catching in apparent abundance; and as is the case with most
American travelers, we had many articles that would be valuable to the
Indian, and beneficial to us to get rid of. But this overgrown company's
interest comes in. "You must not be liberal, or even just, to these
miserable human or savage beings; if you are, it will spoil our trade
with them; we can not control them if they learn the value of our
goods."
This supreme selfishness, this spirit of oppression, was applied not
only to the Digger Indians on the barren Snake plains and the salmon
fisheries of the Columbia River, but to the miserable discharged, and,
in most cases, disabled, Canadian-French. This policy the Hudson's Bay
Company practiced upon their own servants, and, as far as was possible,
upon all the early settlers of the country. In proof of this, hear what
Messrs. Ewing Young and Carmichael say of them on the thirteenth day of
January, 1837, just three months after our mission party had arrived,
and had written to their friends and patrons in the United States
glowing accounts of the kind treatment they had received from this same
Hudson's Bay Company. How far the Methodist Mission joined in the
attempt to coerce Mr. Young and compel him to place himself under their
control, I am unable to say. The Hudson's Bay Company, I know, from the
statement of Dr. McLaughlin himself, had an abundance of liquors. I
also know they were in the habit of furnishing them freely to the
Indians, as they thought the interest of their trade required. Mr.
Young's letter is in answer to a request of the Methodist Mission,
signed by J. and D. Lee, C. Shepard, and P. L. Edwards, not to erect a
distillers on his land claim in Yamhill County (Nealem Valley). The
Methodist Mission was made use of on this occasion, under the threat of
the Hudson's Bay Company, that in case Mr. Young put up his distillery
the Hudson's Bay Company would freely distribute their liquors, and at
once destroy all moral restraint, and more than probable the mission
itself. Lee and party offered to indemnify Mr. Young for his loss in
stopping his distillery project.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account