A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic InformationGray, W. H. (William Henry)
History
A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic Information
Gray, W. H. (William Henry)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Oregon; Oregon Territory -- History
We found Rev. Jason Lee and Mr. Abernethy disposed to ridicule the
proposed organization as foolish and unnecessary. Rev. Jason Lee in his
argument illustrated the folly of the effort, by telling us of a company
of militia gotten up somewhere in Canada. He said "the requisite notice
had been given, and all the people liable to military duty were present
on the day to elect the officers required for the company. When they had
elected all their officers, there was one private soldier left. 'Well,'
says the soldier, 'you may march me, you may drill me, you may face me
to the right, or to the left, or about face, just as much as you please,
but for mercy's sake don't divide me up into platoons.'"
Mr. Abernethy made a little attempt to ridicule the proposed
organization, in moving to amend the resolution recommending three
justices of the peace and three constables. We are now in receipt of an
explanation from the governor in reference to the question of an
independent government, as debated at the Lyceum, which we give
_verbatim_, as it places the governor with his own explanation on that
question, and I think gives us the correct statement of the case, and
shows his policy, which was, to defeat not only the proposition for an
independent government, but any effort for a provisional one, for at
least four years,--which were not only the views of Mr. Abernethy, but
those of Messrs. Lee, Leslie, Babcock, and Hines:--
PORTLAND, March 11, 1866.
DEAR SIR,--Allow me to correct one statement in your History of
Oregon in the _Gazette_ of 5th March. You speak of a debate in a
Lyceum, and say: "Mr. Abernethy moved that in case our government
did not extend its jurisdiction over the country in four years,
that then the meeting would be in favor of an independent
government." The facts are these: We had weekly meetings for
discussion. Mr. Hastings, Dr. McLaughlin's lawyer, offered a
resolution, "That it is expedient for the settlers on this coast to
establish an independent government." This subject was warmly
discussed, Mr. Abernethy being, with a few others, opposed to it.
At the close of the discussion the vote was taken and decided in
favor of an independent government. Mr. Abernethy then offered the
following: "_Resolved_, That if the United States extends its
jurisdiction over this country within four years, it will not be
expedient to form an independent government," as the subject for
the next discussion. This was warmly discussed, many who voted for
the first resolution saying if the United States government is
extended over us, it is all we want, and voted in the affirmative.
The resolution was carried, and destroyed the effect of the first
resolution.
You will see by this you have the thing all wrong.
Yours truly,
GEO. ABERNETHY.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account