A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic InformationGray, W. H. (William Henry)
History
A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic Information
Gray, W. H. (William Henry)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Oregon; Oregon Territory -- History
"The Jesuits were banished from England in 1606. They were expelled from
France, A.D. 1764; from Spain and Sicily, A.D. 1767; from Portugal, A.D.
1789; and totally suppressed by Pope Clement XIV., A.D. 1773. Everywhere
they were prosecuted and repelled as injurious to youth, and dangerous
to all existing forms of government. The present pope has revived the
order, and now we find the Jesuits secretly and openly engaged again in
their pernicious and wicked devices to re-establish his power in the
United States, and in the Canadas."
CHAPTER XXXVI.
The meeting at Champoeg.--Tactics of the Jesuit
party.--Counter-tactics of the Americans.--A division and its
result.--Public record.--Opposition to clergymen as
legislators.--Mr. Hines as an historian.--His errors.--Importance
of Mr. Hines' history.--Extract.--Difficulty among the
Indians.--Cause of the difficulty.
The 2d of May, the day fixed by the committee of twelve to organize a
settlers' government, was close at hand. The Indians had all learned
that the "Bostons" were going to have a big meeting, and they also knew
that the English and French were going to meet with them, to oppose what
the "Bostons" were going to do. The Hudson's Bay Company had drilled and
trained their voters for the occasion, under the Rev. F. N. Blanchet and
his priests, and they were promptly on the ground in the open field near
a small house, and, to the amusement of every American present, trained
to vote "No" to every motion put; no matter, if to carry their point
they should have voted "Yes," it was "No." Le Breton had informed the
committee, and the Americans generally, that this would be the course
pursued, according to instructions, hence our motions were made to test
their knowledge of what they were doing, and we found just what we
expected was the case. The priest was not prepared for our manner of
meeting them, and, as the record shows, "considerable confusion was
existing in consequence." By this time we had counted votes. Says Le
Breton, "We can risk it; let us divide and count." "I second that
motion," says Gray. "Who's for a divide?" sang out old Joe Meek, as he
stepped out; "all for the report of the committee and an organization,
follow me." This was so sudden and unexpected that the priest and his
voters did not know what to do, but every American was soon in line. Le
Breton and Gray passed the line and counted fifty-two Americans, and but
fifty French and Hudson's Bay Company men. They announced the
count--"fifty-two for, and fifty against." "Three cheers for our side,"
sang out old Joe Meek. Not one of those old veteran mountain voices were
lacking in that shout for _liberty_. They were given with a will, and in
a few seconds the chairman, Judge I. L. Babcock, called the meeting to
order, when the priest and his band slunk away into the corners of the
fences, and in a short time mounted their horses and left.
The minutes of the meeting are as follows:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account