A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic InformationGray, W. H. (William Henry)
History
A History of Oregon, 1792-1849: Drawn From Personal Observation and Authentic Information
Gray, W. H. (William Henry)
Frontier and pioneer life -- Oregon; Oregon Territory -- History
It will be remembered that in the investigation of their claims, and the
depositions given, it was stated that Forts Okanagon, Colville,
Kootanie, and Flathead, were still in their possession in 1866; that
Wallawalla, Fort Hall, and Boise were given up because they were
prohibited by the government from trading ammunition and guns to the
Indians. This means simply that the last-named posts were too far from
their own territory to enable them to trade in these prohibited
articles, and escape detection by the American authorities. The northern
posts, or those contiguous to the 49th parallel, are still occupied by
them. From these posts they supply the Indians, and send their
emissaries into the American territory, and keep up the "_deadly
hatred_," of which Mr. Swan speaks, and about which General Gibbs, in
his letter explaining the causes of the Indian war, is so much mistaken.
There is one fact stated by General Gibbs, showing the continued
combination of the Roman priests with the Hudson's Bay Company, which we
will give in this connection. He says: "The Yankamas have always been
opposed to the intrusion of the Americans." This is also a mistake of
Mr. Gibbs, as we visited that tribe in the fall of 1839, and found them
friendly, and anxious to have an American missionary among them. At that
time there had been no priest among them, and no combined effort of the
company to get rid of the American missionary settlements. Kamaiyahkan,
the very chief mentioned by General Gibbs as being at the head of the
combination against the Americans, accompanied us to Dr. Whitman's
station, to urge the establishment of an American mission among his
people.
General Gibbs says, that, "as early as 1853, Kamaiyahkan had projected a
war of extermination. Father Pandosa, the priest at Atahnam (Yankama)
mission, in the spring of that year, wrote to Father Mesplie, the one at
the Dalls, desiring him to inform Major Alvord, in command at that post,
of the fact. Major Alvord reported it to General Hitchcock, then in
command on this coast, Hitchcock _censured_ him as an _alarmist_, and
Pandosa was _censured_ by his superiors, who forthwith placed a priest
of higher rank over him."
The next year, Indian agent Bolon was killed, and the war commenced. How
did General Hitchcock learn that Pandosa, a simple-hearted priest, and
Major Alvord were alarmists? The fact of the censure, and placing a
priest of higher rank over Pandosa at the Yankama station (the very
place we selected in 1839 for an American station), is conclusive
evidence on this point.
"The war of extermination," that General Gibbs, in his mistaken ideas of
Hudson's Bay policy and Indian character, attributes to the policy of
Governor I. I. Stevens, was commenced in 1845. At that time, it was
supposed by James Douglas, Mr. Ogden, and the ruling spirits of that
company, that all they had to do was to withhold munitions of war from
the Americans, and the Indians would do the balance for them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account