A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen VictoriaGrego, Joseph
History
A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen Victoria
Grego, Joseph
Great Britain -- Politics and government; Great Britain. Parliament -- Election
“When the jury was called, his Lordship asked them, upon their
honour, if any of them were freeholders of Middlesex; it
appeared that about eighteen of them were so (specially called
in order that their votes might be lost), on which his Lordship
immediately dismissed them, that they might not be hindered
from discharging their duty at Brentford.”
“Richard Dingham maketh oath that ‘the morning after the
meeting of Sir William Beauchamp Proctor, at St. Giles’s, he
saw four link-lighters named Welch, Hinton, Brady, and Quinn,
disputing about some money they had received from Sir William,
and they said that they had signed an agreement to go down,
with several others, to Brentford on the day of Election to
head a mob, and to put an end to the said Election, when they
should receive orders, etc.’”
In the interval, and during the progress of the election, several men
were committed to prison, including a chairman recognized as having
acted as a leader, who was known as the “Infant,” being, in fact, a
Hercules over six feet high; the true facts of the case came out upon
examination, and, before the close of the poll, four affidavits were
published in the papers, the tenour of which went to prove criminal
complicity.
“Atkinson Bush maketh oath that he was at Brentford on the day
of the election, and seeing a large body of men with labels in
their hats, whereon was written, ‘Proctor and Liberty,’ this
deponent asked them whether they were all voters for Proctor?
upon which they declared they had no votes, but had in their
hands what was as good, and showed him their bludgeons; and
being asked who they supposed would get the election, they
replied Proctor, swearing, if Glynn got the advantage, ‘By
G----, we will have his blood!”
Broughton, the notorious pugilist, happened to find congenial
occupation, having been selected as a temporary generalissimo of the
forces, with special recruiting powers as to the enlistment of his
desperadoes.
“William Wheeler, Joyce, Davis, and other chairmen made oath
that they, with about forty of their order, were engaged
by Broughton, on the promise of a guinea a day each, for
the like purpose of putting an end to the election when the
signal should be given, and, according to the account of the
deponents, all the parties mentioned appeared at Brentford.”
On the next day (December 14), the poll for the election of a knight of
the shire for the county of Middlesex was peacefully concluded in the
presence of the sheriffs and the justices of the peace of the county,
attended by the constables to suppress any further demonstrations.
At the close, the numbers stood, for Serjeant Glynn, 1542; Sir W. B.
Proctor, 1278. It was said, “that the number polled on this occasion
exceeded by forty-two the greatest number ever known to poll at any
previous election.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account