A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen VictoriaGrego, Joseph
History
A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen Victoria
Grego, Joseph
Great Britain -- Politics and government; Great Britain. Parliament -- Election
“I have heard it indeed alleged by courtiers in excuse, that
all the military execution of that day was solely aimed at
Mr. Wilkes, who they hoped would be despatched by some lucky
shot, as Herod expected our Saviour would be murdered among
the innocents he murdered at Bethlehem. As a proof of this
extenuation of the crime, they show flatted balls, which were
discharged by heroes planted in proper places for the purpose,
and which have left marks in the walls about the windows of
Mr. Wilkes’s apartments in the King’s Bench.” “If this has any
foundation in truth,” writes “Philopolis,” “I would advise
the city to be cautious, and never allow above a dozen of its
inhabitants to be seen together at one time, for fear the Riot
Act should arrive unexpectedly, with two or three brigades of
musqueteers, headed by a trading justice, who may think nothing
of the citizens’ lives, provided he has any hopes of murdering
Beckford and the two sheriffs through their sides.”
The petition presented by the lord mayor with such difficulty, and
after many insolent subterfuges and repulses, failed to bring the king
to a reasonable sense of his situation or of the dangers to which the
throne was exposed by the reckless and unconstitutional conduct of the
administration. Subsequently, on the presentation of a “remonstrance,”
the king returned a written reply to the original petition, visiting
with severe censure the persevering claim of invaded birthrights, urged
by “the afflicted citizens,” and treating their just grievances with
reprimand instead of redress; the pleas set forth in the petitions
being considered by His Majesty “as disrespectful to himself, injurious
to his parliament, and irreconcileable to the principles of the
constitution”--a piece of bold duplicity more worthy of the Stuart
dynasty.
The vexed question of Middlesex election, the imprisonment of Wilkes,
the unconstitutional admission of Luttrell into the House, and
particularly the supineness of the King to the petitions and just
remonstrances of his people, are embodied in a metrical form, as--
“A NEW SONG; BEING A POETICAL PETITION TO THE KING.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account