A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen VictoriaGrego, Joseph
History
A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days: Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of Commons from the Stuarts to Queen Victoria
Grego, Joseph
Great Britain -- Politics and government; Great Britain. Parliament -- Election
“that the latter were not; but that, for aught he can find,
they were sent up at the discretion, at first of the Sheriffs,
to whom the writs were sent to send up generally the Burgesses
and citizens of their county, and he do find that heretofore
the Parliament-men, being paid by the country, several boroughs
have complained of the Sheriffs putting them to the charge of
sending up Burgesses.”
This conversation was in January, 1668; in March, Pepys describes his
dining with certain counsel retained by creditors of the navy, the
secretary having been to Cursitor Street to arrange assignments on the
Exchequer to the tune of £1,250,000 in favour of these creditors. The
counsel were pleased to flatter Mr. Secretary upon a recent performance
of his in the Parliament House, and, finding himself with four learned
lawyers, Pepys, with his dinner, enjoyed what he calls “a great deal of
good discourse about parliament”--
“their number being uncertain, and always at the will of the
king to increase, as he saw reason to erect a new borough.
But all concluded the bane of the Parliament hath been the
leaving off the old custom of the places allowing wages to
those that served them in Parliament, by which they chose men
that understood their business and would attend it, and they
could expect an account from, which now they cannot, and so the
Parliament is become a company of men unable to give account
for the interest of the place they serve for.”
Andrew Marvell, member for Hull, who had enjoyed much experience of men
and measures, found fit subject for satire among the corrupt comrades
who now surrounded him in parliament.
“_C._ That traitors to th’ Country in a brib’d House of Commons
Should give away millions at every summons.
_W._ Yet some of those givers such beggarly villains
As not to be trusted for twice twenty shillings.
_C._ No wonder that beggars should still be for giving,
Who, out of what’s given, do get a good living.
_W._ Four Knights and a knave, who were burgesses made,
For selling their consciences were liberally paid.
_C._ How base are the souls of such low-priced sinners,
Who vote with the country for Drink and for Dinners.
_W._ ’Tis they that brought on us this scandalous yoke,
Of excising our cups, and taxing our smoke.
_C._ But thanks to the Harlots who made the King dogg’d,
For giving no more the Rogues are prorogued.”
(ANDREW MARVELL, 1674: _A Dialogue between Two Horses_.)
From his “good discourse on parliament,” Mr. Secretary Pepys, by a
happy coincidence, straightway betook himself to that palace, where
he had the privilege of being well received, and in which, under the
Stuarts, more curious scenes were witnessed than falls to the lot of
even the average of princely abodes:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account