A history of postal agitation from fifty years ago till the present daySwift, H. G.
History
A history of postal agitation from fifty years ago till the present day
Swift, H. G.
Postal service -- Great Britain -- History
“MY LORD,—We, the undersigned sorters attached to the Inland
Branch, beg most respectfully to inform you that, whilst
grateful for the recent improvements made in our pay and
prospects of promotion, we are yet unable to accept it
as a satisfactory settlement of our claims to increased
remuneration; we, therefore, beg to call your Lordship’s
attention to the following facts: Prior to 1867 the scale of
pay for our class was as follows: Minimum of second-class,
23s., by an annual increment of 1s. to a maximum of 38s.;
minimum of first-class, 40s., by an annual increment of 1s.
to a maximum of 50s. After the revision made in June 1867, it
stood thus: Minimum, 24s., by an annual increment of 1s. for
six years, and then by 1s. 6d. to a maximum of 45s. In 1872 the
minimum was increased to 26s., and in July of the present year
the scale was again altered to the following: Minimum 26s.,
with an annual increment of 1s. 6d. for six years, and then by
2s. to a maximum of 45s. Thus it will be seen that whilst the
minimum and annual increment have been increased in amount, the
maximum has been reduced 5s. per week. The only benefit derived
from the last revision was an addition of 6d. to the annual
increment. In former memorials we have asked that the increased
increment of 2s. per week may begin at the minimum of the scale
instead of after six years, as at present; and also, that the
maximum may be restored to the sum of 50s. per week, at which
it originally stood, in accordance with the recommendation of
the Commission of 1854, of which the present Chancellor of the
Exchequer was a member. The scale would then have stood thus:
Minimum, 26s., by an annual increment of 2s. to a maximum of
50s. We respectfully submit to your lordship that, having
regard to our length of service (most of us have served over
nine years), the increased value of labour, and the enhanced
cost of commodities generally, the above would not be more than
a reasonable remuneration for the important duties we perform.
We therefore pray your Lordship to give this Memorial your
favourable consideration, and earnestly hope you will see fit
to grant our Prayer. We are, my Lord, your obedient servants.”
[Here follow Names.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account