It behoves all men of good-will in every country to ponder the extreme
gravity of the situation which is being established throughout the
civilised world. Are we to face a confused struggle of the old sort
between those who have and those who have not, or are we to see the
blessed and beneficent action of a great transforming principle? Is it
to be a contest for the possession of political power, carried on with
violence, and pregnant with incalculable disaster to all concerned? Or
may we expect to watch the peaceful progress of a new type of industry
gradually but effectually realised, under the guidance of men inspired
by high economic and ethical ideals?
In England we have good ground to hope for a peaceful solution. Among
our working classes there is a notable absence of rancour, and even of
bitterness. But it would be very unwise to count upon the continuance of
this spirit, and most unfair to make it an occasion or excuse for
further neglect. It should rather be a stimulus to a truer appreciation
of the position and needs of the working class. If we survey English
history to the beginning of the nineteenth century, our main difficulty
is to determine whether our sins of omission or commission have been the
greater. Both have been heinous and enormous. In the village community
as it existed long ago we see comprehended all that we now call land,
labour, and capital. For the worker it performed the services that are
now rendered by the trade union, the co-operative society, the friendly
and benefit society, and the insurance society. It stood also for local
government, and even to a large degree for what now is national
government, defence, justice, and for education so far as was possible
long ago. The economic, social, and political life of the men of those
earliest times was summed up in the village community.
On the rise of feudalism this village community was transformed into the
manor, and on the downfall of feudalism the manor was changed to the
modern parish, definable as ‘a distinct area, in which a separate
poor-rate is, or can be, levied.’ For a long period after the Black
Death in 1349 labour was scarce and had a great opportunity. Through the
conversion of small holdings into sheep-runs and the dissolution of the
monasteries, labour was made superfluous and helpless. It was a tragic
reversal of the situation which has had serious consequences during all
the centuries that have followed. The opportunities and advantages which
were offered to the worker in ancient times by the village community
were at the close of the reign of Elizabeth reduced to the miserable
privilege of poor relief! The worker could not be regarded as included
within the body politic or social. He was no longer a citizen or member
of the community. He was a landless serf, the subject of the landed
class, and his position was determined by class legislation and class
administration.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account