And it is not historically true to maintain, as Marx does, that the
profits of the capitalist are obtained simply by appropriating the
products of unpaid labour. In initiating and managing, the capitalist is
charged with the most difficult and important part of the work of
production. As a natural consequence, it follows that Marx is also
historically inaccurate in roundly explaining capital as the
accumulation of unpaid labour appropriated by the capitalist. In past
accumulation, as in the control and management of industry generally,
the capitalist has had the leading part. Capital, therefore, is not
necessarily robbery, and in an economic order in which the system of
free exchange is the rule and the mutually beneficial interchange of
utilities, no objection can be raised to the principle of lending and
borrowing of money for interest. In short, in his theory of unpaid
labour as supplying the key to his explanation of the genesis and
development of the capitalistic system, Marx is not true to history. It
is the perfectly logical outcome of certain of the leading principles of
the Ricardian school, but it does not give an adequate or accurate
account of the facts of economic evolution.
In his theory of unpaid labour Marx is not consistent with the general
principles of his own philosophy of social evolution. With him history
is a process determined by material forces, a succession of orderly
phenomena controlled by natural laws. Now we may waive the objection
suggested by the principle enunciated in the Marx school itself, that it
is not legitimate to apply ethical categories in judgment on economic
processes that are merely natural; which, however, Marx does with
revolutionary emphasis throughout some hundreds of pages of his great
work. It is more important to point out, in perfect consistency with the
principles of the school, that the energy and inventiveness of the early
capitalists especially were the most essential factors in determining
the existence and development of a great economic era, and that the
assertion of freedom was an indispensable condition in breaking the
bonds of the old feudal order, which the new system displaced. Instead,
therefore, of living and growing rich on the produce of unpaid labour,
the capitalist had a great social and industrial function to perform,
and played a great part in historic evolution. The position and function
of the workman was subordinate.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account