[18] With it we may compare the name _Enbu-ilum_ on the Obelisk of Manishtusu, Face A, Col. IX., l. 24, Col.XIII., l. 17 ("Délégation en Perse," Mém. II., pll. 2 and 3). [19] See above, Chap. II., p. 52 f. [20] The name has also been read as Alu-usharshid, but the phonetic Sumerian rendering Uru-mu-ush is now in general use. A preferable reading would be the Semitic Rí-mu-ush, Rimush (cf. King, "Proc. Bibl. Arch.," XXX., p. 239, n. 2), since the sign URU at this period was commonly employed with the value _rí_. But, in order to avoid unnecessary confusion, the accepted reading Urumush is retained in the text. [21] Cf. Thureau-Dangin, "Orient. Lit.-Zeit.," 1908, col. 313 f. [22] See further, pp. 251, 273 f., 288, 301 f. [23] The vase-inscription of Urumush in the British Museum was found at Abû Habba, not at Niffer or Tello as implied by Thureau-Dangin, "Königsinschriften," p. 160. [24] See Hilprecht, "Old Bab. Inscr.," I., No. 5, p. 20 f. [25] See Boissier, "Choix de textes relatifs à la divination," I., pp. 44, 81; Jastrow, "Die Religion Babyloniens und Assyriens," II., p. 333; and "Zeits. für Assyr.," XXI. (1908), pp. 277 ff. [26] The mace-head, dedicated to the goddess Ninâ, which is preserved in the British Museum, was found at Abû Habba; see the opposite plate. [27] Such is the form of the name in his own inscriptions. The reading is substantiated by the variants _Manishduszu_ and _Manishdussu_, which occur in Anzanite, inscriptions (see Scheil, "Textes Élam.-Anzan.," I., p. 42, and "Textes Élam.-Sémit.," IV., p. 1; cf. also Hoschander, "Zeits. für Assyr.," XX., p. 246). [28] See Scheil, "Textes Élam.-Sémit.," I., pp. 1 ff. ("Délég. en Perse," Mém. II.), and Hrozný, "Wiener Zeitschrift," XXI., pp. 11 ff. [29] The true pronunciation of the name is uncertain. [30] Literally, "sons." [31] See below, Chap. VIII., pp. 238 ff. [32] The phrase employed possibly implies that they were his grandsons; see Hrozný, "Wien. Zeits.," XXI., p. 19, n. 2, pp. 29, 40. [33] Scheil, "Textes Élam.-Sémit.," I., p. 2. [34] The estate described on the second side of the obelisk is stated to have been bounded on its eastern side by the field of Mesalim; see Face B, Col. VI., ll. 12-14. [35] See above, pp. 99 ff. [36] See above, p. 176 f. [37] The mention of the name Engilsa on a tablet from Tello in connection with that of Urukagina's wife may be merely a coincidence; it has, however, been cited in support of the identification (see above, p. 176, n. 2). [38] See further, Chap. VIII., pp. 228 ff. [39] Cf. Hrozný, "Wien. Zeits.," XXI., p. 40.