A History of the British Army, Vol. 2: First Part—to the Close of the Seven Years' WarFortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
History
A History of the British Army, Vol. 2: First Part—to the Close of the Seven Years' War
Fortescue, J. W. (John William), Sir
Great Britain -- History, Military; Great Britain. Army -- History
Seldom has a commander found more fortunate issue from a series of
blunders than King George. Had Grammont obeyed his orders it is
difficult to see how a man of the Allied Army could have escaped;
but even allowing for Grammont's ill-timed impatience it is strange
that Noailles should have allowed the day to go as it went. It is
true that he had sent the best of his troops across the Main with
Grammont, but he had still from twenty to thirty thousand men on
his own side of the river whom he left standing idle, without an
attempt to employ them. He seems, in fact, to have been paralysed
with dismay over the wreck of his very skilful combinations. The
action itself deserves the name of a combat rather than a battle,
for on neither side was more than half of the force really engaged;
yet Dettingen was decidedly a victory, for the French were badly
beaten and lost little, if any, less than five thousand men,
killed, wounded, and prisoners. The loss of the Allies was about
half of that number, of which the British share was two hundred and
sixty-five killed and five hundred and sixty-one wounded, the most
valuable life taken being that of General Clayton. As the brunt of
the action fell wholly on the first line, the greatest sufferers
among the infantry were the regiments chiefly exposed to the
flanking fire of the French batteries. These were the Thirty-third,
Twenty-first, Twenty-third, and Twelfth of the Line, but in not
one of them did the casualties exceed one hundred men, or about an
eighth of their strength. The cavalry suffered far more heavily
in comparison, though here again the losses of the heroes of the
day, the Third Dragoons, were more than twice as great as those of
any other regiment: one hundred and fifty men and as many horses
forming a terrible proportion of casualties in two squadrons. The
most noticeable points in the engagement were the disgraceful
behaviour of the French infantry, by no one more severely censured
than by Noailles himself, and the deadly accuracy of the British
fire. A smaller but curious fact is that both the King and the Duke
of Cumberland were run away with by their horses, the former, as
has been told, to the rear, the latter to the front, and indeed
into the midst of the French infantry, from which, however, he
emerged with no greater hurt than a bullet in the leg. At the close
of the day the King was so much elated by his success as to revive
the creation of knights banneret in the field, a proceeding which
ceases to seem ridiculous when we learn that Lord Stair was the
first and Dragoon Thomas Brown the last of the new knights. Such a
scene was never to be seen again, for Dettingen was the last action
in which a king of England actually commanded his army in person.
[Sidenote: December.]
[Sidenote: 1744.]
[Sidenote: March 21/April 1.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account