A history of the colonization of Africa by alien racesJohnston, Harry
History
A history of the colonization of Africa by alien races
Johnston, Harry
Africa -- Colonization; Africa -- Discovery and exploration
On the other hand, the surrender of the Cape to Great Britain
induced the latter power to give back to Holland most of the Dutch
possessions in the East Indies, which we had seized and administered
during the Napoleonic wars. If Holland lost South Africa—which she
had only directly ruled for three years—she was enabled by the
British attitude of self-denial to build up an empire in the East
only second in wealth and population to the Asiatic dominions of
Great Britain.
Yet, in an indirect fashion, Dutch Africa exists still, though the
flag of Holland no longer waves over any portion of African soil as
a ruling power. The old rivalry between the English and the Dutch,
which had begun almost as soon as the Dutch were a free people, and
competitors with us for the trade of the East and West Indies, had
created a feeling of enmity between the two races, which ought never
to have existed, seeing how nearly they are of the same stock, and
how closely allied in language, religion, and to some extent in
history—also how nearly matched they are in physical and mental
worth. Curiously enough, there is far greater affinity in thought
and character between the Scotch and the Dutch than between the
Dutch and the English. The same thriftiness, bordering at times on
parsimony, oddly combined with the largest-hearted hospitality, the
same tendency to strike a hard bargain, even to overreach in matters
of business, and the same dogged perseverance, characterize both
Dutch and Scotch; while in matters of religion, almost precisely the
same form of Protestant Christianity appeals to both; so much so,
that there is practically a fusion between the Dutch Reformed Church
and the Presbyterians. Had Scotchmen been sent out to administer
Cape Colony in its early days, it is probable that something like a
fusion of races might have taken place, and there would have been no
Dutch question to cause dissension in South African politics in the
19th century. The Scotch would have understood the Boer settlers and
their idiosyncracies, and would not have made fun of them or been so
deliberately unsympathetic as were some of the earlier English
governors. Slavery would have been abolished all the same, but it
would have been abolished more cautiously, in a way that would not
have left behind the sting of a grievance. But after Cape Colony had
been definitely ceded to Great Britain, its governors in the early
days were mostly Englishmen, who, though often able and just men,
were at little pains to understand the peculiarities of the Boer
character, and to conciliate these suspicious, uneducated farmers.
Another source of trouble was the influx of British missionaries,
who found much to condemn in the Dutch treatment of the natives,
which resembled that in vogue amongst Britons of the previous
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account