A history of the colonization of Africa by alien racesJohnston, Harry
History
A history of the colonization of Africa by alien races
Johnston, Harry
Africa -- Colonization; Africa -- Discovery and exploration
mission under Lieutenant Maistre continued the work of Dybowski, and
was in turn followed by a well-equipped expedition under the command
of the explorer Emile Gentil; which last succeeded in placing a
small armed steamer on the river Shari, and thence reached the
waters of Lake Chad.
By an agreement with Germany in 1892, France secured German
recognition of her sphere of influence over the river Shari, over
the Bagirmi country, and the southern shores of Lake Chad; while, by
a treaty made with the King of the Belgians in 1894, the Belgian
boundary line was drawn at the Mubangi, the Mbomu, and the Nile
watershed. Lastly, by the Anglo-French convention of June 1898,
Great Britain recognized the French sphere to the south and east of
Lake Chad. Thus France obtained European recognition for a
continuous empire stretching from Algiers to the Congo Coast, and
Oran to Dakar—a remarkable outcome of the landing of 37,000 troops
at the Bay of Sidi Ferruj, near Algiers, in the summer of 1830.
In the last decade of the 19th century, the French method of
administering the territories of the Gaboon, Loango and
Congo-Mubangi (grouped since 1888 in one government as “French
Congo”) was infected by the “concessionaire” spirit, which had
unhappily inspired King Leopold II about the same time in his
attitude towards the development of the Congo Independent State.
These monopolist, protectionist ideas were a heritage from the older
style of colonization in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. The
great Berlin Conference of 1884 on the Congo question was supposed
to have vetoed them and rendered their recurrence impossible. But no
sooner was this conference over than this monopolist policy was
revived by the Royal Niger Company on the Niger-Benue, by the infant
Congo State on the Congo above Stanley Pool, by the French in
Loango, and (though much more faintly) by the British South Africa
Company in Rhodesia. But it was mainly in the case of the Royal
Niger Company that the monopoly was one which completely crushed out
other trade. That association did not theoretically forbid the
natives to trade with any foreign merchants but itself; it merely
said to outside traders: “Sorry! but this place is ours, and so is
that—in fact the whole river-bank—and we cannot have you trading on
our private land.” The King of the Belgians copied this policy
pretty faithfully on the Congo, and so did the French. The whole of
French Congo, except two or three old-established towns on the
coast, was divided up into concessions, varying from 20 square miles
in extent to 54,000 square miles. The villages and plantations
actually occupied by the natives at the time were recognized as
native property, but this recognition did not necessarily confer on
the natives the right to trade with whom they pleased.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account