A History of the Durham Miner's Association 1870-1904Wilson, John
History
A History of the Durham Miner's Association 1870-1904
Wilson, John
Coal miners -- Labor unions -- Great Britain -- History; Durham Miners' Association -- History
It was thought desirable to settle certain details before work was
resumed. Amongst these was the restarting of all men as they came out.
Some of the owners demurred, and thereupon the meeting broke up, and
adjourned until Friday, the 3rd. The workmen at that meeting asked for
a plain statement that every man would be engaged at his own work. The
proposal of the owners was as follows:--
OWNERS' RESOLUTION
1. The Owners' Association have decided that no person shall be
refused employment in consequence of having taken part in the affairs
of the Workmen's Associations during the strike; they cannot,
however, give a pledge to re-employ all their workmen, but they will
recommend their members to employ as large a number as possible, and
that the re-engagement of hewers be as follows:--That the places in
each pit be cavilled for according to the last cavilling sheet, and
that men cavilled to the places not intended to commence again shall
be the ones not to be employed, it being understood that one hewer in
a family being cavilled to a place that is to work is equal to the
engagement of the whole family. In cases where a whole seam is
stopped, it having been previously cavilled separately, the men
belonging to such seam shall not be entitled to have a cavil put in
for any other seam. This mode of re-engagement shall not be adopted
as precedent in future cases, either in discharging or employing
workmen.
2. That the owners are not prepared to discharge or remove the
workmen whom they have employed during the strike for the purpose of
reinstating other workmen who were previously employed, but will use
their best endeavours to re-engage those previously employed as
vacancies occur.
REGINALD GUTHRIE,
_Secretary_.
Durham Coal Owners' Association,
_June 3rd, 1892._
The united Committees objected to the second portion, but were willing
to accept the first. No definite agreement was come to, but there was
an understanding that the matter would be allowed to adjust itself
smoothly, which it did, and no disturbance whatever took place in the
absence of an agreement. The united Committees guarded themselves by
drawing up a resolution, in which they interpreted the owners'
resolution to mean that every man would be re-employed as before the
stoppage. At the same time they informed their members that if any
case of refusal took place, then all the other men must refuse to
work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account