A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume IIIMcCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
History
A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume III
McCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
The comparative temperance and lucidity of the Rockingham period seemed
now indeed remote and memorable. Exasperation and not conciliation
appeared to be the persistent note of England's colonial policy. It
was England's misfortune to be peculiarly ill served on both sides of
the Atlantic by those who were intrusted with the conduct of colonial
affairs. It would be hard to say whether the provincial governors
abroad or the ministers at home were least capable of understanding the
people with whom they {148} had to deal, or were most to blame for
their actions in the face of a danger that their own folly had brought
about. With a man like Lord Hillsborough for Secretary of State in
London, with a man like Bernard for Governor of Massachusetts in
Boston, it is not to be wondered at now, and it ought not to have been
wondered at then, that the colonies refused to crystallize into
tranquillity. Francis Bernard was a man of certain ability, certain
gifts, and uncertain good intentions. But he was, as we have seen, a
perfervid Tory, a zealous champion of the royal prerogative, a profound
believer in the wisdom of minimizing, if not abrogating, the privileges
of which the colonists, and especially the colonists of Massachusetts,
were so proud. It was Bernard's peculiar fortune to be not merely the
supporter but the adviser of the English Ministries in almost all the
series of disastrous actions towards their colonies. Bernard was
inspired by a kind of furious folly in his words and deeds. Unhappily,
this kind of furious folly was not confined to the colonial governor.
Lord Hillsborough was no less foolish and no less dangerous than
Bernard. Horace Walpole described Hillsborough as nothing more than a
pompous composition of ignorance and want of judgment. He certainly
was hopelessly ignorant of America, and he certainly showed a hopeless
want of judgment in his dealings with the Americans. Hillsborough
backed up Bernard in his blunders and his braggadocio with the light
heart that comes of an empty head. He backed up Bernard with a steady
zeal that would have been splendid if it could have been made to serve
any useful purpose. Where Bernard was bellicose and blustering,
Hillsborough blustered and was bellicose in his turn. It was
Hillsborough's honest, innate conviction that the American colonists
were a poor-spirited, feeble-hearted, and still more feeble-handed pack
of rascals, braggarts whom a firm front discomfited, natural bondsmen
to whom it was only necessary, as in the old classic story, to show the
whip to awe them into cringing submission. This theory found its
fittest formula a little later, when Hillsborough, speaking for the
Government he adorned, and {149} inspired by a more than usual afflatus
of folly, declared that "we can grant nothing to the Americans except
what they may ask with a halter round their necks." It is difficult to
believe that a reasonable minister, endowed with a sufficient degree of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account