A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume IIIMcCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
History
A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume III
McCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
As soon as it was plain that the new men of the new Council were
hostile to Hastings, Hastings's enemies were eager enough to come
forward and help in the work. One of Hastings's oldest and bitterest
enemies was the Brahmin Nand Kumar. Nand Kumar had always been hostile
to Hastings. Now, when Hastings was in danger, was {261} threatened
with defeat and with disgrace, Nand Kumar came forward with a whole
string of accusations against him, accusations to which Francis,
Clavering, and Monson listened eagerly. Nand Kumar accused Hastings of
many acts of shameless bribery, declared that he himself had bribed him
in large sums, and produced a letter from a native princess in which
she avowed that she had bribed Hastings in large sums. The three
councillors appear to have accepted every word uttered by Nand Kumar as
gospel truth. Hastings, on his side, refused to be arraigned at his
own Council-board by a man whom he alleged to be of notoriously
infamous character, though he and Barwell were perfectly willing that
the whole matter should be referred to the Supreme Court. At last
Hastings withdrew from the Council, followed by Barwell. The others
immediately voted Clavering into the chair, summoned Nand Kumar before
them, listened to all that he had to say, and on that evidence, in the
absence of the accused man, the self-constituted tribunal found
Hastings guilty of taking bribes from the princess, and ordered him to
repay the sum of thirty-five thousand pounds to the public treasury.
For the moment it seemed as if Francis and his party had carried the
day. Hastings had his back to the wall, he seemed to be well-nigh
friendless. The triumvirate declared that there was no form of
peculation from which Hastings had thought it reasonable to abstain,
and they formally charged him with having acquired by peculation a
fortune of no less than forty lakhs of rupees in two years and a half.
Suddenly, when the position of Hastings appeared to be at its worst, it
changed. Nand Kumar and two Englishmen named Fowke, who had been very
zealous against Hastings, were charged before the Supreme Court with
conspiracy, in having compelled a native revenue farmer to bear false
witness against Hastings. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court was
Elijah Impey, Hastings's old and attached friend, a circumstance of
which much has been made. While Nand Kumar was bound over for trial on
the charge of conspiracy, another and more serious charge was brought
against him by a native attorney, who {262} accused him of forging and
publishing a bond. On this charge Nand Kumar was arrested, and after a
lengthy hearing of the case committed to the common jail.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account