A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume IIIMcCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
History
A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume III
McCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
It did pass, but it took its long time to pass. The trial lasted seven
years. Begun in the February of 1788, it ended in the April of 1795.
In that long space of time men might well be excused if they had grown
weary of it. Had its protracted course been even pursued in colorless,
eventless times it would have been hard to preserve the public interest
in the trial so terribly drawn out. But it was one of the curious
fortunes of the trial to embrace within its compass some of the most
thrilling and momentous years that have been recorded in the history of
mankind. In the year after the trial began the Bastille fell. In the
year before the trial closed the Reign of Terror came to an end with
the deaths of Robespierre and St. Just. The interval had seen the
whole progress of the French Revolution, had applauded the
constitutional struggle for liberty, had shuddered at the September
massacres, had seen the disciplined armies of the great European Powers
reel back dismayed before the ragged regiments of the Republic, had
seen France answer Europe with the head of a king, with the head of a
queen, had observed how the Revolution, like Saturn, devoured its own
children, had witnessed with fear as well as with fury the apotheosis
of the guillotine. While the events in France were shaking every
European State, including England, to its centre, it was hard for the
public mind to keep itself fixed with any degree of intentness upon the
trial of Warren Hastings.
The events of that interval had affected too, profoundly, the chief
actor in the trial. Burke entered upon the impeachment of Warren
Hastings at the zenith of his great career, at the moment of his
greatest glory. The rise and progress of the French evolution
exercised a profound, even a disastrous, effect upon him. For once his
fine intellect failed to discriminate between the essentials and the
non-essentials of a great question. His horror at the atrocities of
the Revolution blinded him to all the advantages that {285} the success
of the Revolution brought with it. The whole framework of that great
event was to him so hideously stained with the blood of the Queen, with
the blood of so many innocent persons, that he could see nothing but
the blood, and the influence of this is to be noticed in Burke's final
speech with its almost confident expectation that the guillotine would
sooner or later be established in England. Burke's frenzy against the
French Revolution made it appear to many as if his reasoned and careful
indictment of the erring Governor-General might after all be only mere
frenzy too.
[Sidenote: 1788-95--Acquittal of Hastings]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account