A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume IIIMcCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
History
A History of the Four Georges and of William IV, Volume III
McCarthy, Justin H. (Justin Huntly)
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
If Wilkes's release filled his supporters throughout the country with
delight, it only spurred on his enemies to fresh attempts and fresh
blunders. Had they left the matter where it stood, even though it
stood at a defeat to them, they would have spared themselves much
ignominy. But the fury of the King inspired a fiercer fury in the
ministers and those who followed the ministers. Every weapon at their
command was immediately levelled at Wilkes, even, it may not be
unfairly asserted, the assassin's weapon. Wilkes carried himself
gallantly, defiantly, even insolently. His attitude was not one to
tempt angry opponents to forbearance. His letters from the Tower and
after his release to Lord Halifax were couched in the most contemptuous
language. He brought an action against Lord Halifax. He brought an
action against Mr. Wood, the Under-Secretary of State, and was awarded
1,000 pounds damages. When Lord Egremont died, in the August of 1763,
Wilkes declared that he had "been gathered {64} to the dull of ancient
days." He republished the numbers of the _North Briton_ in a single
volume with notes, to prove that the King's speech could
constitutionally be only regarded as the utterance of the King's
ministers. There must have been a splendid stubbornness in the man
which enabled him to face so daringly, so aggressively, the desperate
odds against him.
[Sidenote: 1763--Wilkes and his accusers]
Every man who wished to curry favor with the King and the King's
ministers was ready to strike his blow at Wilkes. There was not a
bully among the hangers-on of the King and ministers who was not eager
to cross swords with Wilkes or level pistol at him. Insult after
insult, injury after injury, were offered to the obnoxious politician.
The King dismissed him from the colonelcy of the Buckinghamshire
Militia. Lord Temple was the Lord-Lieutenant of the county of
Buckinghamshire, and as Lord-Lieutenant it was his duty to convey to
Wilkes the news of his disgrace. Never was such news so conveyed.
Temple told Wilkes of his dismissal in a letter of warm enthusiasm, of
warm personal praise. The King immediately retaliated by removing
Temple from the Lord-Lieutenancy and striking his name off the list of
privy councillors. The enmity was not confined to the King and to the
parasites who sought to please the King. Dr. Johnson declared that if
he were the monarch he would have sent half a dozen footmen to duck
Wilkes for daring to censure his royal master or his royal master's
ministers. In the House of Commons the hostility was at its height.
When Parliament met Wilkes sought to call the attention of the House to
his case, but was anticipated by Grenville, who read a royal message
directed at Wilkes, the result of which was that the House voted that
the number Forty-five of the _North Briton_ was a seditious libel, and
ordered it to be burned by the common hangman.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account