A History of the Four Georges, Volume IMcCarthy, Justin
History
A History of the Four Georges, Volume I
McCarthy, Justin
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
the Stuart crown was to go down, "there are heads to be broke." For
George the First to attempt to form a Coalition Cabinet of Whigs and
Tories at such a time would have been about as wild a scheme as for M.
Thiers to have formed a Coalition Cabinet of Republicans and of
Bonapartists, while Napoleon the Third was yet living at Chiselhurst.
[Sidenote: 1714--The Treaty of Utrecht]
The Tories had been much discredited in the eyes of the country by the
Peace of Utrecht. The long War of the Succession had been allowed to
end without securing to England and to Europe the one purpose with
which it was undertaken by the allies. It was a war to decide whether
a French prince, a grandson of Louis the Fourteenth, and whose
accession seemed to threaten a future union of Spain with France,
should or should not be allowed to ascend the throne of Spain. The end
of the war left the French prince on the throne of Spain. Yet even
this fact would not in itself have been very distressing or alarming to
the English people, however it might have pained others of the allied
States. The English people probably would never have drawn a sword
against France in this quarrel if it had not been for the rash act of
Louis the Fourteenth in recognizing the chevalier, James Stuart, as
King of England on the death of his father, James the Second. But
England felt bitterly that the Peace of Utrecht left France and Louis
not only unpunished, but actually rewarded. All the campaigns, the
victories, the sacrifices, the genius of Marlborough, the heroism of
his soldiers, had ended in nothing. Peace was secured at any price.
It was not that {93} the people of England did not want to have a peace
made at the time. On the contrary, most Englishmen were thoroughly
tired of the war, and felt but little interest in the main objects for
which it had been originally undertaken. Most Englishmen would have
agreed to the very terms which were contained in the Treaty,
disadvantageous as these conditions were in many points. But they were
ashamed of the manner in which the Treaty had been brought about, more
than of the Treaty itself. France lost little or nothing by the
arrangement; she sacrificed no territory, and was left with practically
the same frontier which she had secured for herself twenty years
before. Spain had to give up her possessions in Italy and the Low
countries. The Dutch got very little to make up to them for their
troubles and losses, but they could do nothing for themselves, and the
English statesmen were determined not to continue the war. Yet, on the
whole, these terms were not altogether unsatisfactory to the people of
England. The war was becoming an insufferable burden. The National
Debt was swollen to a size which alarmed at that time and almost
horrified many persons, and there seemed no chance whatever of the
expulsion of Philip, the French prince, from Spain. All these
considerations had much influence over the public mind, and possibly
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account