A History of the Four Georges, Volume IIMcCarthy, Justin
History
A History of the Four Georges, Volume II
McCarthy, Justin
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
The hearts of the Patriots must have rejoiced when they heard such an
argument from the lips of Walpole. For what did it amount to? Only
this--that this un-English Minister, this unworthy servant of the
crown, positively admitted into his own mind the idea that there was
any possibility of England's being worsted in any war with {156} any
state or any number of states! Fancy any one allowing such a thought
to remain for an instant in his mind! As if it were not a settled
thing, specially arranged by Providence, that one Englishman is a match
for at least any six Spaniards, Frenchmen, or other contemptible
foreigners! Walpole's great intellectual want was the lack of
imagination. If he had possessed more imagination, he would have been
not only a greater orator, but a greater debater. He would have seen
more clearly the effect of an argument on men with minds and
temperaments unlike his own. In this particular instance the appeal to
what he would have considered cool common-sense was utterly damaging to
him. Pulteney pounced on him at once. "From longer forbearance," he
exclaimed, "we have everything to fear; from acting vigorously we have
everything to hope." He admitted that a war with Spain was to be
avoided, if it could be avoided with honor; but, he asked, "will it
ever be the opinion of an English statesman that, in order to avoid
inconvenience, we are to embrace a dishonor? Where is the brave man,"
he demanded, "who in a just cause will submissively lie down under
insults? No!--in such a case he will do all that prudence and
necessity dictate in order to procure satisfaction, and leave the rest
to Providence." Pulteney spoke with undisguised contempt of the
sensitive honor of the Spanish people. "I do not see," he
declared--and this was meant as a keen personal thrust at Walpole--"how
we can comply with the form of Spanish punctilio without sacrificing
some of the essentials of British honor. Let gentlemen but consider
whether our prince's and our country's honor is not as much engaged to
revenge our injuries as the honor of the Spaniards can be to support
their insolence." There never, probably, was a House of Commons so
cool-headed and cautious as not to be stirred out of reason and into
passion by so well-contrived an appeal. The appeal was followed up by
others. "Perhaps," Sir William Wyndham said, "if we lose the character
of being good fighters, we shall at least gain that {157} of being
excellent negotiators." But he would not leave to Walpole the full
benefit of even that doubtful change of character. "The character of a
mere negotiator," he insisted, "had never been affected by England
without her losing considerable, both in her interest at home and her
influence abroad. This truth will appear plainly to any one who
compares the figure this nation made in Europe under Queen Elizabeth
with the figure she made under her successor, King James the First.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account