A History of the Four Georges, Volume IIMcCarthy, Justin
History
A History of the Four Georges, Volume II
McCarthy, Justin
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
Spithead, found guilty of having failed in his duty, and shot on March
14, 1757. He died like a brave man. It went heavily against Newcastle
in later days that he was believed to have promised the sacrifice of
Byng before the trial had even begun. No one now believes that Byng
was a coward; and nothing but a miracle could have enabled him with
such a force to save Minorca. But he failed sadly in his duty, whether
from stupidity or irresolution, and probably he would not have cared to
outlive his degradation. The punishment was stern and harsh indeed,
but it was a time to excuse sternness on the part of a government on
whom had fallen the conduct of a great war. Pitt did his best to
induce the King to mitigate the penalty in accordance with the
unanimous recommendation of the court-martial; but George was
inflexible, and reminded Pitt that he had himself taught the Sovereign
to seek outside the House of Commons for the judgment of the English
people. It was to the execution of Byng that Voltaire applied the
famous epigram, "In England it is thought necessary to kill an admiral
from time to time to encourage the others"--"_pour encourager les
autres_." Voltaire tried hard to save Byng, and even induced the Duc
de Richelieu to write a letter bearing his personal testimony to the
unfortunate admiral's courage.
The Duke of Newcastle resigned office, and for a short time the Duke of
Devonshire was at the head of a coalition Ministry which included Pitt.
The King, however, did not stand this long, and one day suddenly turned
them all out of office. Then a coalition of another kind was formed,
which included Newcastle and Pitt, with Henry Fox in the subordinate
position of paymaster. Pitt now for the first time had it all his own
way. He ruled everything in the House of Commons. He flung himself
with passionate and patriotic energy into the {299} alliance with that
great Frederick whose genius and daring were like his own. Pitt was a
heaven-born war-minister. His courage and his resources changed the
whole fortunes of the war. He seemed a statesman to organize victory.
He stirred up the languishing patriotism of the hour, and filled it
with new and noble inspiration. It was true what George had said to
him--that he had taught, or tried to teach, the Sovereign to seek
outside the House of Commons for the voice of the English people. But
this was to the honor of Pitt, and not to his discredit. Pitt saw that
a legislature returned on such a representation could be no spokesman
of the English people. He knew that intelligence and education were
beginning to spread with increased wealth through large unrepresented
classes, and even communities. While he had the people behind him he
cared little for the Sovereign, and still less for the House of
Commons. His pride was as great as his patriotism; he might be broken,
but he could not bend. At last he had found his true place--at the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account