A History of the Four Georges, Volume IIMcCarthy, Justin
History
A History of the Four Georges, Volume II
McCarthy, Justin
Great Britain -- History -- 1714-1837; Great Britain -- Politics and government -- 1714-1837
The danger in which George had been, and out of which he had escaped,
did not in any way soften the hearts of King and prince, of father and
son, towards each other. The prince still occupied a suite of rooms in
St. James's Palace, and the King and he met on public occasions, but
they never spoke. The Queen was even more constant in her hatred to
the prince than the King himself. It does {77} not seem possible to
find out how this detestation of the son by the mother ever began to
fill the Queen's heart. She was not an unloving mother; indeed, where
her affection to the King did not stand in the way, she was fond and
tender to nearly all her children. But towards her eldest son she
seems to have felt something like a physical aversion. Then, again,
the King was a dull, stupid, loutish man, over whose clouded faculties
any absurd prejudice or dislike might have settled unquestioned; but
Caroline was a bright, clever, keen-witted woman, who asked herself and
others why this or that should be. She must have many times questioned
her own heart and reasoned with herself before she allowed it to be
filled forever with hatred to her son. Lord Hervey, who had a true
regard for her, and in whom she trusted as much as she trusted any
human being, does not appear to have ever fully understood the cause of
the Queen's feelings towards the prince; nor does he appear to have
shared her utter distrust and dislike of him. As far as one can judge,
the prince appears to have been fickle, inconsiderate, and flighty
rather than deliberately bad. He sometimes did things which made him
seem like a madman. Such a person would not be charmed into a
healthier condition of mind and temper by the knowledge daily thrust
upon him that his own father and mother, and his own sister, were the
three persons who hated him most in the world. Of course, in this as
in other cases of a palace quarrel between a king and an eldest son,
there was a bitter wrangle about money. The prince demanded an
allowance of one hundred thousand a year to be secured to him
independently of his father's power to recall or reduce it. The King
had hitherto only given him what Frederick called a beggarly allowance
of fifty thousand a year, and even that had not been made over to the
prince unconditionally and forever. The prince argued that his
father's civil list was now much larger than that of George the First
at the time when the Prince of Wales of that day, George the Second
now, was allowed an income of one {78} hundred thousand a year. The
Princess of Wales had as yet received no jointure, and she and the
prince were thus kept, as Frederick's friends insisted, in the
condition of mere pensioners and dependants upon the royal bounty. The
prince's friends were, for the most part, eager to stir him up to some
open measure of hostility; especially the younger men of the party were
doing their best to drive the prince on. Pulteney, it must be said,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account