A History of the French Novel, Vol. 1: From the Beginning to 1800Saintsbury, George
History
A History of the French Novel, Vol. 1: From the Beginning to 1800
Saintsbury, George
French fiction -- History and criticism
Master Francis does not exactly plunge into the middle of things; but he
spends comparatively little time on the preliminaries of the ironical
Prologue to the "very illustrious drinkers," on the traditionally
necessary but equally ironical genealogy of the hero, on the elaborate
verse _amphigouri_ of the _Fanfreluches Antidotees_, and on the mock
scientific discussion of extraordinarily prolonged periods of pregnancy.
Without these, however, he will not come to the stupendous banquet of
tripe (properly washed down, and followed by pleasant revel on the
"echoing green") which determined the advent of Gargantua into the
world, which enabled Grandgousier, more fortunate than his son on a
future occasion, to display his amiability as a husband and a father
unchecked by any great sorrow, and which was, as it were, crowned and
sealed by that son's first utterance--no miserable and ordinary infant's
wail, but the stentorian barytone "_A boire!_" which rings through the
book till it passes in the sharper, but not less delectable treble of
"_Trinq!_" And then comes a brief piece, not narrative, but as
characteristic perhaps of what we may call the ironical _moral_ of the
narrative as any--a grave remonstrance with those who will not believe
in _ceste estrange nativite_.
[Sidenote: The birth and education.]
I doubt me ye believe not this strange birth assuredly. If
ye disbelieve, I care not; but a respectable man--a man of
good sense--_always_ believes what people tell him and what
he finds written. Does not Solomon say (Prov. xiv.), "The
innocent [simple] believeth every word" etc.? And St. Paul
(1 Cor. xiii.), "Charity believeth all things"? Why should
you _not_ believe it? "Because," says you, "there is no
probability[91] in it." I tell you that for this very and
only reason you ought to believe with a perfect faith. For
the Sorbonists say that faith is the evidence of things of
no probability.[92] Is it against our law or our faith?
against reason? against the Sacred Scriptures?[93] For my
part I can find nothing written in the Holy Bible which is
contrary thereto. But if the Will of God had been so, would
you say that He could not have done it? Oh for grace' sake
do not make a mess of your wits in such vain thoughts. For I
tell you that nothing is impossible with God.
And Divinity being done with, the Classics and pure fantasy are drawn
upon; the incredulous being finally knocked down by a citation from
Pliny, and a polite request not to bother any more.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account