A history of the Irish poor law, in connexion with the condition of the peopleNicholls, George, Sir
History
A history of the Irish poor law, in connexion with the condition of the people
Nicholls, George, Sir
Poor laws -- Ireland -- History
“The strict limitation of relief to the workhouse may possibly be
objected to, on the ground that extreme want is found occasionally
to assail large portions of the population, who ought then to be
relieved at the public charge, without being subjected to the
restraint of the workhouse. But this is an exceptional case, and it
would not, I think, be wise to adapt the regulations of poor-law
administration in Ireland to the possible occurrence of such a
contingency. In a period of famine, the whole population may be said
to become destitute; but it surely would not be expedient to hold
out an expectation, that if this should unhappily occur, support for
_all_ would be unconditionally provided at the public charge?—During
such a visitation, the workhouse might not be sufficient for the
numbers who were anxious to crowd into it; but to the extent of its
means of accommodation it would help to relieve the general
distress, and the union machinery would probably be found useful in
other respects. The occurrence of a famine, however, if general,
seems to be a contingency beyond the powers of a poor-law to provide
for. There is then an actual deficiency of supply; and as there is
less to consume, less must be consumed. It is however, I think,
impossible to contemplate the continuance of such a state of things
in Ireland, as that in which any considerable portion of its
population would be subjected to the occurrence of famine. As the
habits and intelligence of the people improve, these visitations
will be guarded against or averted; and I do not propose to make any
exception permissive of out-door relief in such cases, but recommend
that relief should be limited strictly to the workhouse. It is
moreover necessary that no individual of a family should be
admitted, unless all its members enter the house. Relief to the
father or husband is equivalent to relief to the child or the wife,
and _vice versâ_; and, while they continue one family, a part cannot
be considered as destitute, and the rest not so; a family must be
taken as a whole, and so admitted or excluded. The provisions of
_the 43rd of Elizabeth_, requiring parents to support children, and
children to support parents, should also be extended to Ireland; and
I think relief by way of loan, as provided for by the _58th section_
of the Poor Law Amendment Act, might in certain cases be useful, and
if exercised with discretion, can scarcely be productive of
mischief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account