A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 2, Jan.-Sep. 1809 : $b From the battle of Corunna to the end of the Talavera campaignOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 2, Jan.-Sep. 1809 : $b From the battle of Corunna to the end of the Talavera campaign
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
could have reached Abrantes or Almeida or any other goal that he
chose.
The fact was that the reasons for refusing to adopt a ‘forward
policy’ were moral and not physical. Cradock, in common with Sir John
Moore and many other British officers, believed that Portugal could
not be defended, and was thinking more of securing himself a safe
embarkation than of exercising any influence on the main current of
the war.
When Moore’s army had passed out of sight, and was known to be
retiring in the direction of Galicia, it seemed to Cradock that
his own position was hopeless. Even if granted time to concentrate
his scattered battalions, he would be forced to fly to the sea and
take shipping the moment that any serious French force crossed the
frontier. He had not sufficiently accurate information to enable him
to see that both Lapisse at Salamanca, and the weak divisions of the
4th Corps which lay in the valley of the Tagus, could not possibly
move forward against him. It would have been insane for either of
these forces to have attacked Portugal--the one was at this moment
less than 10,000, the other about 12,000 strong--they were without
communications, and separated by 100 miles of pathless sierras.
Moreover the troops in the valley of the Tagus were fully occupied in
observing the Spanish army of Estremadura. At the opening of the New
Year, therefore, Cradock was in absolutely no danger, and might have
gone forward either to Abrantes or to Almeida in perfect security. In
the first position he would have menaced the flank of the 4th Corps:
in the second he would have exercised a useful pressure on Lapisse.
In either case he would have encouraged the Portuguese and lent moral
support to the Spaniards.
But Cradock was possessed by that miserable theory which was so
frequently expounded by the men of desponding mind during the
early years of the Peninsular War, to the effect that Portugal was
indefensible, and would have to be evacuated whenever a strong French
force approached its frontier[235]. It was fortunate for England and
for Europe that Wellesley had other views. The history of the next
three years was to show that a British general could find something
better to do than to pack up his baggage and prepare to embark,
whenever the enemy came down in superior strength to the Portuguese
border.
[235] Sir John Moore himself ventilated this view in a letter
to Lord Castlereagh from Salamanca, Nov. 25, 1808. It is this
fact that explains Napier’s very tender treatment of Cradock,
who quoted Moore as his justifying authority. Moreover Cradock
had been very obliging in placing all his papers at Napier’s
disposal, a fact which prepossessed the historian in his favour.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account