A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Meanwhile the near approach of Hill and the force from Madrid, with
Soult’s army in pursuit, was modifying the position from day to day.
By November 4th Hill, as we have already seen, was at Villacastin with
all his five infantry divisions, and the 7,000 or 8,000 Spaniards of
Morillo and Carlos de España. He was being followed by the French, but
reported that day that he had so far seen no more than four regiments
of cavalry and two battalions of infantry. Was this the advanced
guard of the whole 60,000 men whom Soult and King Joseph had brought
against Madrid, or was it a mere corps of observation? ‘I do not think
it clear,’ wrote Wellington to Hill, at 9 o’clock on the morning of
November 5th, ‘that the enemy is following you in force. I conceive
these four regiments and two battalions to have been sent only to see
what you are doing.’[142] This day Wellington could have united himself
to Hill without any fear of being hindered by either of the French
armies, and could have had the whole of his 65,000 men concentrated
between Medina del Campo and Arevalo within thirty-six hours. The
enemy, though their two armies taken together outnumbered him by more
than 25,000 men, could not possibly unite within a similar time. He
had, therefore, the position which enterprising generals most desire,
that of lying between the two fractions of a hostile force, which
cannot combine easily, and of being able to bring superior numbers
against either one of them. One can speculate without much difficulty
as to what Napoleon would have done in a similar posture of affairs.
But Wellington, after mature consideration, resolved that it would not
be prudent to unite the two halves of his army and to march against
one or other of his enemies. It is fortunate that he has left a record
of the reasons which prevented him from doing so. They are contained
in a dispatch to Lord Bathurst dated November 8th, when he had already
committed himself to a wholly different policy. If he were to march
with his own army, he wrote, to join Hill about Arevalo, with the
object of falling upon the heads of Soult’s columns as they debouched
on Villacastin, Souham could cross the Douro unopposed behind him at
Toro, whose bridge was now repaired, and get behind his left flank.
While he was engaged with Soult and the King, who might conceivably
have 50,000 men at the front[143], and be able to offer a good
resistance, Souham could close in on his rear, and after cutting him
off from Salamanca and his magazines, could attack him, while he was
committed to the contest with the army from Madrid.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account