A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The general feeling in the army was that nearly all the loss and
mischief had happened in the inclement days of November 15-18, previous
disorders having been comparatively insignificant; and as regards
those days they questioned the justice of Wellington’s indictment of
the troops. To say that ‘the army had suffered no privations which
but trifling attention on the part of the officers could not have
prevented’ was simply not true. What ‘trifling attention’ on the part
of the regimental officers could have made up for the fact that some
divisions had received absolutely no distribution of food of any sort
for four continuous days, and others in the same four days nothing
but two rations of beef, and no biscuit or other food at all?[218]
It was useless to tell them that they had suffered no privations, or
that they could by care have avoided them. As an intelligent general
officer wrote on November 20: ‘During the whole of this retreat from
the 15th inclusive, not only has the weather been dreadfully severe,
but the commissariat arrangements having failed, the troops have been
mostly without any issue of rations, and have suffered the extremity
of privation, having lived upon acorns and hogs killed occasionally
in the woods. The natural result of this has been great disorder and
confusion, and the roads in the rear of the columns of march are
covered with exhausted stragglers left to the enemy. In fact, by some
inconceivable blunder, which the Quartermaster-General’s department
attribute to that of the Commissary-General, and which the latter throw
back on the former, the supplies of the army, which were adequate for
much larger numbers, on the morning that we broke up from the Arapiles
were sent down the Tormes, by Ledesma toward Almeida, while the army
marched on Ciudad Rodrigo--_hinc illae lachrymae_[219].’
There is no doubt that sheer lack of food during inclement weather,
and in a desolate and thinly peopled forest-country did most of the
mischief. As an indignant subaltern writes: ‘The officers asked each
other, and asked themselves, how or in what manner they were to blame
for the privations of the retreat. The answer uniformly was--in no way
whatever. Their business was to keep the men together, and if possible
to keep up with their men themselves--and this was the most difficult
duty--many of these officers were young lads badly clothed, with
scarcely a shoe or a boot left--some attacked with dysentery, others
with ague, more with a burning fever raging through their system; they
had scarce strength to hobble along in company with their more hardy
comrades, the rank and file[220].’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account