A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
the future when the whole available field force of the French armies
of Spain, superior in number by a third to Wellington’s army, had been
collected on a single field, and had allowed the enemy to march away
practically unmolested? ‘Wellington goes off unbeaten, with the glory
of his laurels of the Arapiles untarnished, after having restored to
the Spaniards all the lands south of the Tagus, after having forced us
to destroy our own magazines and fortifications, and deprived us of all
the resources that resulted from our former conquests and ought to have
secured their retention[236].’ There was a profound dissatisfaction
throughout the French Army; and as the winter drew on, and the ill
news from Russia began slowly to drift in, it became evident that the
old remedy for all ills so often suggested in 1810-11--the personal
appearance of the Emperor in Spain with large reinforcements--was never
likely to come to pass. Indeed, troops would probably be withdrawn
from Spain rather than sent thither, and the extra subsidies in money,
for which King Joseph was always clamouring, were never likely to be
forthcoming from the Imperial Exchequer.
As to the past campaign, belated recriminations continued to fly about:
Clarke--the Minister of War at Paris--was the central point round which
they revolved, since it was through him that the reports went to the
Emperor from Spain, and to him that the rare answers came back from
some Russian bivouac, when the master had a moment’s leisure from his
own troubles. Generally he wrote in a very discouraging strain: ‘vous
sentez qu’éloigné comme je suis, je ne puis rien faire pour les armées
d’Espagne[237].’ His occasional comments were scathing--Marmont’s
reports were all lies, he was to be interrogated in a formal series of
questions, as to why he had dared to fight at Salamanca. The quarrels
of Joseph and Soult were unworthy of serious attention: ‘il ne pouvait
pas s’occuper de semblables pauvretés dans un moment où il était à la
tête de 500,000 hommes, et faisait des choses immenses.’ Considering
the way in which Soult had wrecked all the plans of the King and Joseph
in June-July, by deliberate disobedience to a long series of orders
sent by his hierarchic superior, it was poor comfort to Joseph to be
told that he must continue to put up with him. ‘Le Maréchal Soult
est la seule tête militaire qu’il y eût en Espagne: on ne pouvait
l’en retirer sans compromettre l’armée[238].’ ‘Why had the King ever
returned to Spain in 1811?’ said the Emperor--though a reference to
the correspondence between them in that year tends to show that Joseph
had offered to abdicate, or take any other step prescribed to him,
and that it was his brother who preferred to keep him at Madrid as a
figure-head. Napoleon, it is clear, was vexed at being worried by the
affairs of the Peninsula at a moment when he required all his time
for the contemplation of his own problems, and discharged his wrath,
deserved or undeserved, in all directions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account