A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The inner meaning of these somewhat double-edged phrases is explained
in a memorandum for Lord Bathurst, the British Secretary of State
for War, which was sent home under the same cover as the Cadiz
document[273]. It was eminently not a letter to be shown to Spaniards,
and contained some of the most bitter expressions concerning them which
Wellington ever penned. No use could be got out of their armies, he
wrote, unless they were under his control. They had lost nearly all
their guns and cavalry, and generally could not act in bodies separate
from the Allied Army. Their discipline, equipment, and organization
was as bad as ever: yet if put in line with his own troops they might
behave quite well. He would prevent by good management repetitions
of those terrible disasters to individual armies which had so often
happened in past years. But his power over them must be made real,
and for that purpose he intended to apply the financial screw. All
subsidies advanced by the British Government to Spain must for the
future be expended wholly on such Spanish troops as were actually
employed in co-operation with the Anglo-Portuguese army, or else those
troops would become a fresh burden on the military chest. And in his
letter to Cadiz he had been careful to show that he did not intend
to allow the Spanish Government to dictate a military policy to him,
because they had placed their troops at his disposition.
These letters, sent off from the camp before Burgos on October 5,
got to London on October 20, and the Prince Regent’s approbation of
Wellington’s acceptance of the offer from the Cortes was granted at
once[274]. The dispatch conveying it was delivered at Cadiz on the 17th
of November, and on the 20th the Cortes confirmed its former decree,
and sent off a formal warrant of appointment to the new generalissimo,
which reached him at Freneda on December 4th. The confirmation was
not made with such general approval as the original appointment--and
for good reason. By this time it had become evident that Wellington
was not about to drive the French over the Pyrenees: he had raised
the siege of Burgos, and when the Cortes repeated their vote, was
known to be in full retreat for Salamanca. Hopes from his success
were no longer so high as they had been in September, and a nasty jar
had been given to the whole arrangement by the mutinous conduct of
Ballasteros, who (as has been shown in an earlier chapter) had issued a
manifesto against all submission to foreign generals, and had refused
to obey Wellington’s directions at a critical moment. It is true that
Ballasteros had been arrested and imprisoned, without any consequent
trouble[275]; but it was known that there were other Spanish generals
who were not without sympathy with his views.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account