A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
There had been much reorganization since the end of the Burgos retreat.
In uniforms especially the change was greater than in any other year of
the war: this was the first campaign in which the British heavy cavalry
showed the new brass helmet, discarding the antiquated cocked hat--the
light dragoons had gone into shakos, relinquishing the black japanned
leather helmet with bearskin crest. Infantry officers for the first
time appeared in shakos resembling those of the rank and file--the
unwise custom by which they had up till now worn cocked hats, which
made them easy marks for the enemy’s snipers, being at last officially
condemned. Another much needed improvement was the substitution of
small tin camp kettles, to be carried by the men, for the large iron
Flanders cooking-pots, four to each company and carried on mules, which
had hitherto been employed. They had always been a nuisance; partly
because the mules could never be relied upon to keep up with the unit,
partly because their capacity was so large that it took much firewood
and a long space of time to cook their contents. Nothing is more common
in personal diaries of 1808-12 than complaints about rations that had
to be eaten half-cooked, or were not eaten at all, because the order to
move on arrived before the cauldrons had even begun to get warm.
A more doubtful expedient was that of putting the great-coats of the
whole of the infantry into store before the march began. Wellington
opined that the weight of coat and blanket combined was more than the
soldier could be expected to carry. One or other must be abandoned,
and after much consideration it was concluded that the blanket was more
essential. ‘Soldiers while in exercise during the day seldom wear their
great-coats, which are worn by them only at night, together with the
blanket: but as the Commander of the forces has now caused the army to
be provided with tents, the necessity for the great-coat for night use
is superseded[355].’ And tents, as a matter of fact, were provided for
the first time during this campaign. The expedient worked well enough
during the summer and autumn, when the weather was usually fine, in
spite of some spells of rainy weather in June. But in the Pyrenees,
from October onward, the tents proved inadequate protection both from
sudden hurricanes and from continuous snowfall. And bad though the
plight of men huddled in tents frozen stiff by the north wind might be,
it was nothing to that of the sentry on some mountain defile, trying
to keep a blanket round his shoulders in December blizzards. Yet the
tents, with all their defects, were a decided boon--it would have been
impossible indeed to hold the Pyrenean passes at all, if some shelter
had not been provided for the battalions of the front line. Villages
available for billeting were few and always in the hollows to the
rear, not on the crests where the line of defence lay. It would seem
that the experiment of dispensing with the great-coats was dropped,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account