A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the PyreneesOman, Charles
History
A history of the Peninsular War, Vol. 6, September 1, 1812-August 5, 1813 : $b The siege of Burgos, the retreat from Burgos, the campaign of Vittoria, the battles of the Pyrenees
Oman, Charles
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
There can be no doubt that Napoleon undervalued the power of the
Spanish guerrilleros, just as he undervalued the resources and the
enterprise of Wellington. From the first moment of his return from
Russia he had continued to impress on Joseph and Jourdan the necessity
for pacifying the North, before the season for regular campaigning
should have arrived, and Wellington should have taken the field. But
his theory that the winter was the best time for dealing with the
bands was rather specious than correct. For although the short days,
the snow in the passes, and the swollen torrents were, no doubt,
great hindrances to that freedom of movement which was the main
strength of the guerrilleros, they were even greater hindrances to
combined operations by bodies of regular troops. Rapid marches are
impossible off the high roads in Northern Spain, during the midwinter
months; and it was only by combined operations and the use of large
forces that the insurgents could be dealt with. Indeed, the country
roads were practically impassable for any regular troops in many
regions. What officer would risk detachments in upland valleys that
might be found to be blocked with snow, or cut off from their usual
communication by furious streams that had overflowed the roads and made
fords impracticable? Winter marches in unexplored hills are the most
deadly expedients: all the weakly soldiers fall by the way--had not
Drouet lost 150 men in passing the Guadarrama during the early days
of December--and the Guadarrama was crossed by one of the few great
royal roads of Spain? What would be the losses of columns sent out on
cross-roads and caught in blizzards, or in those weeks of continuous
rain which are not uncommon in the sub-Pyrenean region?
The Emperor’s view was that Caffarelli had failed in his task from want
of resourcefulness. He was always trying to parry blows rather than to
strike himself: he allowed the insurgents to take the initiative, and
when they had executed some tiresome raid would set out in a pursuit
which was seldom useful, since they naturally outran him[384]. He was
always marching to deliver or revictual some threatened garrison,
anywhere between Santoña and Pampeluna, instead of setting himself to
destroy the main agglomeration of hostile forces. Now Caffarelli, it is
true, was no great general, and may have been on occasion wanting in
vigour. But the best reply to the criticism of him sent from Paris is
to observe that his successor, Clausel, universally acknowledged to be
the most active officer in Spain, failed in exactly the same way as his
predecessor, even when he had been lent 20,000 veteran troops to aid
him in his task.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account