preaching ministry; and looked to the secular power to restrain the
vices and reform the manners of the clergy, and to govern the Church. He
shows that
"most of the English Reformers were acquainted with Wycliffe's
works: Cranmer declares that he set forth the truth of the Gospel;
Hooper recalls how he resisted 'the popish doctrine of the Mass';
Ridley, how he denied transubstantiation; and Bale, how he
denounced the friars.... Bale records with triumph that, in spite
of the efforts to suppress (the writings of Wicliffe), not one had
utterly perished."[375]
And Dr. Rashdall goes the length of saying:
"It is certain that the Reformation had virtually broken out in the
secret Bible-readings of the Cambridge Reformers before either the
trumpet-call of Luther or the exigencies of Henry VIII.'s personal
and political position set men free once more to talk openly
against the Pope and the monks, and to teach a simpler and more
spiritual gospel than the system against which Wycliffe had
striven."[376]
Even if it be admitted that these statements are somewhat strong, they
at least call attention to the fact of the vigorous Lollard leaven which
permeated the English people, and are a very necessary corrective of the
misleading assertions of Dr. James Gairdner on the matter.
Henry VIII. had other popular forces behind him--the rooted dislike to
the clergy which characterised a large mass of the people, the effects
of the teaching of the Christian Humanists of England, and the spread of
Lutheran opinions throughout the land.
The Bishop of London, writing to Wolsey about the proposal to try his
Chancellor, Dr. Horsey, for complicity in the supposed murder of Richard
Hunne, declared that if the Chancellor
"be tried by any twelve men in London, they be so maliciously set
_in favorem hæreticæ pravitatis_ that they will cast and condemn
any clerk though he were as innocent as Abel."[377]
This dislike was not confined to the capital. The Parliaments showed
themselves anti-clerical long before Henry had thrown off his allegiance
to Rome;[378] and Englishmen could find no better term of insult to
throw at the Scots than to call them "Pope's men."[379]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account