In the “Brief,” it is asked (Q. 28): “Were not many of the Endowments
which the Church of England now holds given to the Church of Rome?” No,
is the answer, and it adds, “Not a single endowment was given to the
Church of Rome.” Both question and answer are misleading. The Church
of England was never _the Church of Rome_. The correct way to put the
question, but which would not suit the misleading object the author of
the “Brief” had in view, is, “Were not almost all the endowments, which
the Church of England now holds, given to her when she held the same
doctrines as the Church of Rome?” Yes. The main object of the grants and
endowments of land, churches, tithes, etc. was that perpetual prayers
should be offered up by the recipients and their successors for the souls
of the benefactors, of their families and relatives. The benefactors
believed in the doctrine of purgatory, and in the efficacy of prayers to
bring their souls out of it. The Church of England in pre-Reformation
days believed and taught the same lucrative doctrine. It also taught
that works of charity and not faith were stepping-stones to heaven. Two
churches, E and R, held the same doctrines, and both received large
endowments in tithes, lands, etc., in support of such doctrines. For
centuries E was in possession of such endowments, but in the sixteenth
century E repudiated the doctrines by the teaching of which E had
obtained the endowments from certain benefactors who otherwise would not
have given them. Parliament permitted E to hold the ancient endowments on
certain conditions specified in Acts of Parliament, and E now dishonestly
ignores the conditions, holds the doctrines repudiated, but keeps a firm
grip on the ancient endowments. E has but a parliamentary title to the
ancient endowments. And as such, Parliament has the right to change and
convert the endowments, if it should think proper, to other purposes.
At the period of the Reformation there was no physical transfer of the
endowments from the old to the new trustees; from incumbents who would
not conform to the Acts of Parliament, to those who did conform. The
incumbents who were in possession of the endowments before the Acts
were passed, and who conformed to the Acts when passed, were left in
possession of them, and as their successors similarly conformed to the
Acts, they peaceably entered into possession; so there was no physical
transfer of the property, but there was a change of trustees when the
old trustees declined to conform to the Acts of Parliament, but no
change when they did conform. It is therefore very clear that the Church
of England holds her ancient endowments by a parliamentary title, just
as the Sovereign does the throne. And the logical sequence is that
Parliament has the right, if it should think proper, to convert the
endowments to any other use, especially when the present holders are
frequently ignoring the conditions upon which they were granted at the
Reformation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account