the abbot or prior took care to get the lion’s share of both parochial
tithes and offerings. The capitular bodies, nuns and religious military
orders imitated the practice of the monks and received similar licences
for appropriating churches from the king and bishop. The same system
was adopted by single persons, such as deans, chancellors, treasurers,
precentors, and archdeacons. Even parochial incumbents had nominated
vicars to do their work, and they themselves became sinecure rectors. The
pretext which the monks had given to gain appropriations was to obtain
two parts of the tithes and profits, leaving a third to the parish. These
two parts were for the relief of the poor and the repair of the church;
but in course of time they neglected both poor and fabric, and the
parishioners, for their own comfort, had actually subscribed towards a
fabric fund and hence originated church rates which were, like tithes, at
first purely voluntary, but subsequently became compulsory.
When the practice of appropriating churches, with their glebe and tithe
endowments, was first introduced by the Norman monks in England, the
patrons or owners considered that they were transferring a freehold
property, and therefore thought the conveyance did not require the
bishop’s confirmation. The patron conveyed his gift by placing the deed
of conveyance and a knife or cup upon the altar of the church of the
monastery, as this was then the usual mode of livery of seisin. In the
deeds of conveyances some are given “Canonicis ibidem Deo servientibus,”
etc.; others, “Canonicis regularibus ibidem Deo servientibus,” etc.; and,
“Monachis ibidem Deo servientibus,” etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account