members of Parliament after the Bill was introduced, who had churches
on their own estates, and in their neighbourhood, where large church
endowments existed. The clause included all the landed estates and house
property of the bishops, chapters, prebendaries, sinecure rectories,
etc. In London there are lamentable cases of small incomes in parishes
where there are no local claims, and large incomes of adjacent parishes,
arising from local claims.
For example, the Finsbury estate in London consists of three acres of
land, which were given, in the fourteenth century, by a layman to St.
Paul’s for the support of one prebendary. The Corporation of London
leased this estate from the dean and chapter, and built valuable houses
upon it. The Act of 1840 vested this property, on the expiration of the
lease, in the Ecclesiastical Commissioners. In 1867 the lease expired,
and the Commissioners came into possession of £60,000 _per annum_ from
the rentals of this property. By the Act of 1840, there would be no local
claim, for none of this revenue came from tithes. But by the Act of
1860, there was a local claim. Hence eighteen district churches within
the parish had their incumbents’ incomes raised to £500 a year each; new
costly parsonage houses were erected, and large annual sums are allowed
to the churchwardens of all these churches for the church services and
repair of churches. But not a shilling was given to the poor incumbents
in the adjacent populous parochial districts.
APPENDIX E.
The Septennial Average Prices of Wheat, Barley, and Oats from 1835 to
1890, or 55 years, taken from Willich’s Tithe Commutation Tables.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account